Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
Your situation is worse than I thought - you're an ignoramous, a liar, a distorter, a person totally incapable of thought.

Sweetheart, you are the one claiming that a contraceptive can kill a baby after it has been born. You'd better go look up the definition of neonate, kiddo.

Sheesh, what a loon you are.

52 posted on 02/04/2008 6:16:18 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody
Read post #51. You're making it a personal issue - and have almost from your first post.

I made a mistake because I was focused on the first days after conception...which is the heart of the issue. Neonates was completely irrelevant except as a part of your analogy...and that analogy illustrates perfectly what I have against your position; the difference between a fertilized egg and a living baby is far, far greater than that between a neonate and a toddler. So much greater as to make the analogy ridiculous to anyone of reasonable judgement.

Furthermore, look closely at Romney's reasoning. The contractive works as an abortifacient on fertilized eggs which have not yet attached themselves firmly to the uterine wall...but not afterwords. But, in nature, fertilized eggs quite often fail to attach properly and die. Shall we intervene after every sexual act to try to save every fertilized egg? Pretty much tells you how articificial the whole pro-life argument has become.

53 posted on 02/04/2008 8:16:06 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson