Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush, Fresh Off State of the Union, Set to Sign Order Directing Fed Agencies to Ignore Earmarks...
Fox News ^ | 01/29/08

Posted on 01/29/2008 6:39:49 PM PST by BOBWADE

WASHINGTON — President Bush was set to act Tuesday on his State of the Union promise to sign an executive order directing federal agencies to ignore any future earmarks not voted on by Congress. Bush warned lawmakers he would flourish his veto pen if Congress does not rein in the number of congressional earmarks — money set aside for pet projects — that make it into law without a vote. As many as 95 percent of earmarks are inserted after Congress has voted on appropriations measures, and the pork is never seen by most lawmakers.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; earmarks; eo; presidentbush; sotu
Original title is "Bush, Fresh Off State of the Union, Set to Sign Order Directing Fed Agencies to Ignore Earmarks Not Voted On by Congress"
1 posted on 01/29/2008 6:39:52 PM PST by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

If he had done that in in 2004, he might still have a Republican majority in Congress.


2 posted on 01/29/2008 6:42:54 PM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

A strong stand taken when there is absolutely no chance for it to make a difference.


3 posted on 01/29/2008 6:43:34 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
A strong stand taken when there is absolutely no chance for it to make a difference.

Considering the fact that it does not take effect till next year, it is 99.9% BS.

4 posted on 01/29/2008 6:46:56 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I support it given the fact it must be removed by executive order. Explaining that could prove difficult.


5 posted on 01/29/2008 6:48:52 PM PST by eyedigress ( leave junior alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Also about a year too late.

He did his best to scuttle the evil conservatives when they took him on about Harriet Meyer and his Amnesty plan. I really thnk that his lack of defending himself and his party was payback for the conservatives for not rubber stamping his nominee and Amnesty bill. Now he is trying to act like a conservative again. A little to little and a little to late IMHO.


6 posted on 01/29/2008 6:53:25 PM PST by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

I did hear today that Clinton has added around 261 earmarks since her election in 2000. McCain has no earmarks at all and he’s been there for 25 or so years. Can anyone verify this?


7 posted on 01/29/2008 6:53:44 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I heard that too. At least that is one difference in the two. Perhaps a vote for McCain would be better than not voting although I am still not too sure.


8 posted on 01/29/2008 6:56:58 PM PST by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

I don’t like McCain. I don’t think he has the temperament to be President. That being said, come November I will absolutely vote for the lesser of two evils. I really don’t want the greater of two evils to win.


9 posted on 01/29/2008 7:09:18 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Explaining that could prove difficult.


Except by a democrat. They won’t explain it at all and the media won’t ask. It would be barely mentioned.


10 posted on 01/29/2008 7:16:22 PM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
Loser RINOs are the primary reason conservative Republicans are so mad. We're fed up the sell out of the country (Amnesty), Pork Barrel Earmarks, refusing to budge on making tax cuts permanent when they are in power.

McCain/Feingold was supposed to be vetoed by Bush, who sold out and signed the bill, now making it law that we are shut out less than 30 days before an election - insuring continued "job security" from those at the top who are sucking us dry, then telling us that illegal aliens only want to do the jobs that ordinary Americans refuse to do.

Those guys need to be packed up once and for all and sent back to the boonies.

11 posted on 01/29/2008 7:29:17 PM PST by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

Please do not create your own or alter any title of any published material. The title you used now has to be changed.


12 posted on 01/29/2008 7:37:15 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

Good for him.


13 posted on 01/29/2008 8:03:15 PM PST by mtnwmn (mtnwmn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
"If he had done that in in 2004, he might still have a Republican majority in Congress."

Ih had done that in 2001 we would have had budget surpluses for six years.

14 posted on 01/30/2008 4:08:09 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson