Correct.
Did you read the article? That is what he said!
The article simply said that reporters asked him to clarify his statements on religion. They did not say, "What do you think of Christianity?" Nor did they say, "What do you think of Jesus?" You say that he answered a question that wasn't in fact asked. And yes, I did "read the article." Weird that someone would read an article and come to a diametrically opposite point of view on it. I'm betting this isn't the first time.
OK mr/mrs sanity, what was he talking about, the price of tea in China? Did you read the article?
He was not going to say "I believe in Jesus so you can vote for me" or any other sundry throwaway dumb quotes which mean absolutely nothing in a political campaign ("I go to church twice a week." "Jesus Christ is my personal Lord and Savior, now vote for me.")
He said, in effect, I'm not going to toot my own religious credentials to try to hype my candidacy. I respect him for that. I probably would have done the same thing. It's probably the reason that his candidacy ended this early. But it's probably the reason he'll be able to look himself in the mirror in the morning with integrity and self-respect intact. I'm not sure a Republican candidate left in the race can do that. Ron Paul probably could, but mirrors aren't in the Constitution so he doesn't have one.
I'm not attacking Thompson, I've been defending Dobson.
By attacking Thompson. It can't be both ways. Dobson can't be a highly intelligent and articulate defender of the faith and simultaneously be unaware how his statements about Thompson would be perceived and used.
Both will need lots of prayers
Why would Thompson need any more prayer than my Aunt Barb?
ROTFL