[Petronski]

For your entertainment.

Maybe it should get a mention over at NRO’s Corner too.

[holden]

Ah, the secular humanist progressive religion has the concept of

"You are not your own: for you have been bought with a price: therefore glorify NOW with the mouth of your abundant corporate body, and with your spirits, which are Cape Cod's finest."
— (a take-off on 1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

HF

[PBRSTREETGANG]

[sappy]

love watching dems/libs cannibalize each other for a nomination.

[Tymesup]

165 posts and no mention of Juanita Broaddrick.

Mrs. Clinton’s husband was credibly accused of raping Juanita. Rather than throw the bum out, she tried to intimidate Juanita. Perhaps NOW could find a better candidate to endorse.

[kalee]

ROFLOL They say hell hath no fury and these gals may just give us a glimpse.

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

Well, he's never had very good luck with women...

[pray4liberty]

Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal.

Hardly.

[Natty Bumppo@frontier.net]

Never forget that the ultimate goal for the dims is victory in the November elections.

I think that the party elites have seen enough of Hill and Bill on the primary campaign trail in what has been a controlled, benign, environment, to realize that both are one video frame away from a fatal campaign error that will make the Dean scream and Dukakis in a tank look like astute political maneuvering.

There is no way the dims elites now want Hillary! at the top of (or perhaps anywhere near) their ticket.

The appeals to party unity and the good of the nation will start any day now.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Kennedy needs to kiss and make up by taking the NOW nags out for a nice joy ride.

[Salvation]

A little late, but here's the popcorn to watch the dimocrats fight.

[AmericanExceptionalist]

I will candidly admit that this is a good example of the adage, The enemy of my enemy is my friend. More to the point: Barack Obama is personable enough, but hugely liberal. Teddy Kennedy is also incredibly liberal--a big minus, in my book--but without even the sunny personality to help attenuate the difficulty I have with him on policy issues (and with the burden of Chappaquidick to boot). So an endorsement of one ultra-liberal by another ultra-liberal should hardly be cause for celebration.

Or so it would seem.

And yet I was enormously happy to see the Kennedy clan--well, three of them, amyway--endorsing Barack Obama.

Why?

The only explanation I can come up with is that it seemed like a hot poker in the collective eye of Billary; and that was enough to bring me some momentary joy.

[doug from upland]

Bringing back this great article when NOW went crazy on The Lifeguard.