Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The KG9 Kid
This would be a definitive address of the 2nd by the courts and protection of firearms ownership, but as I said, there would be a very narrow definition to support the DC area, not any admission of the rest of the laws now in effect.

Miller was narrowed to the provisions of a sawed-off shotgun/militia argument and opened the door to regulation of machine guns, silencers, et al, wholly to control gangster activity when there was not enough law-enforcement to do the job.

18 posted on 01/28/2008 10:36:31 AM PST by Pistolshot (Those with a lively sense of curiosity learn something new every day of their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Pistolshot
Pistolshot said: "Miller was narrowed to the provisions of a sawed-off shotgun/militia argument and opened the door to regulation of machine guns, silencers, et al,"

That's not really true. Obviously, machine guns and most of the items covered under NFA 34 ARE the types of arms useful to a militia. The Miller decision was simply ignored, not broadened, to include such arms.

41 posted on 01/28/2008 11:34:43 AM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson