If I understand correctly, this research is solely for the purpose of helping people with varied diagnoses that have no effective treatment a chance to get better.
I have second hand experience with the treatment plan as one of my family had serious medical issues. This member had lost the ability to maintain balance, read, do math, lost years of functioning. Last November, a wheelchair or walker was required all day. There was not a doctor or specialist that was able or willing to offer any treatment plan or hope, and trust me, we saw many.
Stumbled on the MarshallProtocol website, did the research, it made sense. Talked to folks on the plan, and sure enough, they are really getting better.
Finally found a doctor willing to prescribe the very safe and cost effective medications. Now six months into the treatment plan—
Now, this person is able to roller blade backwards, read at grade level, and is well on the way to getting a functioning immune system. Intense pain is relieved. The doctor is dumbfounded at the progress.
The major problem with this protocol is the established medical community, who were not taught this by their revered professors at their prestigious universities. Therefore, the science behind it cannot be true.
A recent example: not too many years ago, every elite medical school and teaching college taught every student that there were no bacterium that could survive the toxic acids in our stomachs. Too bad that they never taught that to the h. pylori giving everyone ulcers. It took years for that knowledge to trickle down. But now it is common practice to prescribe antiobiotics for ulcerated stomachs. A few short years ago, it was considered malpractice....
In short, these simple and safe medications have saved one member of my family and has greatly improved the quality of life for the rest of us because we no longer have to provide 24/7 care.
The concern and care from strangers who are fellow sufferers has been extraordinary.
Now, sometimes, that's exactly what it takes to cut through the establishment's multiple layers of shielding from the truth. Being the tip of the arrow is not a job for the gentle or faint of heart.
It does mean, as is often the case in overturning 'generally accepted truths', that the pioneering work has to be followed up by someone else, who is more wood, less sharp point.
My guess (I'm no bio-medical specialist) is that this treatment is brilliantly focused attack on what is becoming a more common cause of several forms of systemic diseases. It flips a few biological processes around dramatically, which can be just what the doctor ordered (well, would order if he only understood.)
I can't tell yet if there is any way to reliably say ahead of time who would benefit from the treatment. Perhaps that's not a serious problem, if the side affects of applying the treatment to someone who shouldn't have gotten it are not too serious.
Now, this person is able to roller blade backwards, ...Wonderful!