[mimaw]

Perfectly said. I agree with you 100%. The dems have been successful in the past by using small incremental pieces of legislation to achieve their means, we on the other hand are ready to throw the baby out with the bathwater because we didn’t get 100%. Look at this presidents accomplishments and you can not in good conscience call him a failure. The conservative movement is not monolithic each of us have our concerns some vote on life issue only, some on economics, some on 2nd. amendment rights and some on immigration and trade policies and isolationism. How does any candidate appeal to all these issues, when we don’t agree on many of them.

[AndyJackson]

Look at this presidents accomplishments and you can not in good conscience call him a failure

What accomplishments. He got a couple of good judges in, but only after the Hariett Myers debacle. And he landed us in a godawful quagmire in the middle east because we had not plan what to do once Sadam was out. We are going to be bogged down for another 10 years. And getting support for Iraq has cost him virtually every other important policy issue.

He tried to get nuclear energy going and failed. He promised us he was going to do things for small business (deregulation and lawsuit abuse reform). Not a peep out of him on those issues. He kept renominating Greenspan which was a great idea until it wasn't, and then replaced him with his inbred second cousin. And he created the biggets boondogle of an inept bureaucracy in the history of the federal government - homeland security.

No, I don't think this is going to go down in history as a great administration.