The so-called “social conservatives” who have sworn to stay home ..... to do so is. objectively, a vote for shrillary, .... a conservative court will be squandered at the altar of “principle”
Why is this so hard to fathom ?
***********************************************
We understand full well that a vote for McCain (anything to get along with Teddy!!) or Rudy (”I think Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg is a great jurist!”) is identical to a vote for Hill as far as the SC goes AND much more destructive to the RNC which is badly in need of a tune-up ,,, if we get Rudy or McVain it won’t be fixed with a tune-up ,, it’ll have to be scrapped... and that would put us on the same path as ancient Rome and Greece with a big Wil-E-Coyote rocket strapped on...
Well, to each who responded in generally the same vein
“What dif will electing a Rino make ?”
The difference is, the POSSIBILITY, however infinitesimal, that when the likely 3 judges retire in the next administration they will not be replaced with paramours of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
It’s a chance, maybe a slim one, versus a GUARANTEED liberal court appointed by the beast.
I prefer slim odds to no odds at all.
Right-wing, evangelical, conservative, heterosexual, white male here. Any questions ?