Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grimmy
Just to show these views are the historical norm check this out from the dissent to the Dred Scott decision:

"[W]hen a strict interpretation of the Constitution, according to the fixed rules which govern the interpretation of laws, is abandoned, and the theoretical opinions of individuals are allowed to control its meaning, we have no longer a Constitution; we are under the government of individual men, who for the time being have power to declare what the Constitution is, according to their own views of what it ought to mean."
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 621 (1857) (Curtis, J., dissenting).

20 posted on 01/25/2008 5:48:12 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: joebuck

Thanks. I never read that quote. Prescient.


23 posted on 01/25/2008 5:58:39 PM PST by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: joebuck

Yep. Old problem. Egos rise to power, along with the bodies that house them.

There are/were some wrongnesses written into the Constitution. It is no sacred document given by God’s hand. But there are processes for addressing those wrongs and activist judges isn’t one of them.

They should not be tolerated.


24 posted on 01/25/2008 6:01:10 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson