>> And do you have verses from the Song of Solomon mentioning oral or anal sex?
I don’t recall anal ... but I think oral is implied. Don’t have a copy on me — but supposedly several of the verses regarding kissing the “navel” of the female may not have been referring to the navel. I think its may be a translation issue.
H
Thanks. One can interpret things in various ways, of course. (Although that’s not the activity that was mentioned in the article, anyway.)
It's not the sort of think I like to write about, but it fully justifies the description of "filthy" or "pollution" in both senses, religious and the physical.
What do you think it is that makes gay men's orifices so microbiologically zooey? I'll clue you in: mixing oral, anal, and penile biota.
I hope I won't have to be more specific than that.