Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CautiouslyHopeful

Conservative does not have to mean support for aggressive Militarism. Sensible militarism in defense of US territory and US citizens and their property, yes. On this issue, Ron Paul is a strong as you can be.


5 posted on 01/25/2008 1:03:20 PM PST by ToryNotion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ToryNotion

But is immediate withdrawal from Iraq really a viable option? Will it not leave a power vacuum?

For that matter, this gold standard business seem odd to me. Or am I just not “conservative” enough for it?


9 posted on 01/25/2008 1:05:31 PM PST by CautiouslyHopeful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion
On this issue, Ron Paul is a strong as you can be

Paul's view is the same as John Murtha's. I pray I never need you people to defend my country.

23 posted on 01/25/2008 1:10:49 PM PST by chesty_puller (70-73 USMC VietNam 75-79 US Army Wash DC....VietNam was safer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion
Sensible militarism in defense of US territory and US citizens and their property, yes.

...and 'sensible militarism' does not include the type of abrupt withdrawal that most in the Paul camp seem to espouse. Sorry, but until Paul "gets this", he's simply not an option.
76 posted on 01/25/2008 1:39:59 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion

You are on the Wrong website. You should try the Daily Kos.

That anti-american crap is never going to sell here, even if you dress it up as old-school isolationism.


77 posted on 01/25/2008 1:40:01 PM PST by darkmatter ("Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in humiliation and disaster" William T. Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion
Sensible militarism in defense of US territory

Do you believe that also means putting the military and national guard on the border to help control illegal immigration?

81 posted on 01/25/2008 1:41:24 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion

So Ron Paul will position soldiers in tall buildings?


201 posted on 01/25/2008 3:05:22 PM PST by ajay_kumar (United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion
Conservative does not have to mean support for aggressive Militarism. Sensible militarism in defense of US territory and US citizens and their property, yes. On this issue, Ron Paul is a strong as you can be.

That's a really good comment.

279 posted on 01/25/2008 4:39:27 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion

Guess you were banned. It was still a good comment.


280 posted on 01/25/2008 4:41:40 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion

Can you point me to any of his position papers? Something with an actual plan of action?

I’m especially interested in his Military and Foreign Policy positions.

Thank you.


287 posted on 01/25/2008 5:01:11 PM PST by papasmurf (No "Leftovers" for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ToryNotion

“Sensible militarism in defense of US territory and US citizens and their property, yes. On this issue, Ron Paul is a strong as you can be.”

Oh, BS. The man is on record stating that ‘a few submarines’ would provide an adequate defense. That hardly qualifies the man as being “as strong as you can be”.


296 posted on 01/25/2008 5:18:06 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson