Perhaps so. But, how much did he have to "contribute" to get that picture with them? Did they return the money?
What this picture does is muzzle Hillary from using Resko as a club on Obama. She can no longer bring up Rezko without Obama pulling out this photo and setting her back on her heels.
We all know that the Clintons don't do anything out of the goodness of their heart. There's always something in it for them. I'm sure money passed hands somewhere. It's the pattern of their life.
>Perhaps so. But, how much did he have to “contribute” to get that picture with them? Did they return the money?
Now THAT is a valid question.
Re: how much did he have to “contribute” to get that picture with them? Did they return the money?
What are the chances this question will be asked by Lauer even if he does another interview with her?
So Shrillary was taking HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pictures during her sojurn in the White House.
I guess being an aprentice paparazzi makes for an excellent president.
If Regan was an actor I guess a photogapher is OK.
Memo to self....file a Freedom of Information suit to get a look at these historic pics.
A wing at the Smithsonian no doubt.
If I were Hillary, I’d simply say, “Well, I may be in his picture — but at least I’m not in his pocket.” Everyone knows these “grip & grin” photos are essentially meaningless. Remember Newt’s with Abramoff?