To: Justa
Perhaps he was a scapegoat for the bank’s actions. The loss was too much for the bank to accept responsibility for so they made a patsy agreement with the suspect and he went away.
LOL! Yeah, I'm sure that's it. Why would SG dump $70 billion into a falling market if they didn't have to?
20 posted on
01/25/2008 12:36:08 PM PST by
VegasCowboy
("...he wore his gun outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.")
To: VegasCowboy
21 posted on
01/25/2008 1:34:51 PM PST by
Justa
(Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson