1 posted on
01/24/2008 3:20:35 PM PST by
Checkers
To: Checkers
2 posted on
01/24/2008 3:21:16 PM PST by
Biggirl
(A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
To: GOP_Lady; redgirlinabluestate; societygirl; NYC Republican; TheLion; lgwdnbdgr; MHT; misterrob; ...
3 posted on
01/24/2008 3:21:36 PM PST by
Checkers
(John McCain is Bob Dole minus the character, humor, class, record, loyalty, mental fitness...)
To: Checkers
The next President of the United States!
To: Checkers
It still comes down to how that up to 40% who had voted early by last week cast their ballots. I don’t think the polls will turn out to be all that accurate. Nor do I claim any knowledge of how it will turn out. Most of the polls also seem to include non-Republicans, for some odd reason. (and that undoubtedly inflates McCain.) I’m holding out hope for McCain to finish 3rd or lower.
5 posted on
01/24/2008 3:25:07 PM PST by
Ingtar
(MOE 2008 - - I hope there are enough pieces to salvage in 2012)
To: Checkers
How tall is Romney? As a 6’6 citizen, I feel it’s time for a president that towers over everyone. Fred dropped out, unfortunately.
6 posted on
01/24/2008 3:30:54 PM PST by
SoDak
To: Checkers
Both of these polls already have threads. Hugh Hewitt is a better cheeleader than pundit.
9 posted on
01/24/2008 3:41:36 PM PST by
Plutarch
(For Mitt since 2006.)
To: Checkers
Notice how Fox News only uses polls that show McCain slightly up?
To: Checkers
Stop McCain! Vote Romney!
21 posted on
01/24/2008 4:10:41 PM PST by
claudiustg
(You know it. I know it. I'm optiMITTstic!)
To: Checkers
Of the polling outfits who have been active in more than a couple of states this cycle, Mason-Dixon seems to have the best record of accuracy.
25 posted on
01/24/2008 4:19:05 PM PST by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: Checkers
The more the media tries to shove McCain down our throats the lower his poll numbers are going. It’s working so well I hope the NY Times and the rest keep it up.
To: Checkers
Hopefully, these numbers will hold or increase. I’d like to see McCain fade.
29 posted on
01/24/2008 5:08:09 PM PST by
CASchack
To: Checkers
31 posted on
01/24/2008 5:30:26 PM PST by
SwinneySwitch
(US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
To: Checkers
Now that the NY Times has endorsed Hillary and McCainery, this can only help Mitt for those who see right through this baloney.
To: Checkers
Does this mean Mitt is gaining and McLame is staying the same???
Turnout will mean it all.
I hope Mitt reaches out to the Cuban community. Seems like all the cuban spokespeople are McLame backers.
39 posted on
01/25/2008 12:52:35 PM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson