If I wanted to be dishonest I wouldn't have added a tagline endorsement - yesterday - and would pretend complete objectivity. I used to have a tagline that read "A Presidential endorsement here forfeits any claim of objectivity" because I think that is a fair presumption. It doesn't mean I, or others, can't be objective just that it is fair to question our motivation. Fine.
That being admitted, Hunter stated before his endorsement of Huckabee that he wouldn't support Romney because of a company's action in regards to military sales to China of which Romney had no role. The company in question was already resurrected when this decision was made absent Romney. That was when I seriously questioned Hunter's "integrity" and this endorsement only adds to my suspicion of his anti-Romney attitude.
“That was when I seriously questioned Hunter’s “integrity” and this endorsement only adds to my suspicion of his anti-Romney attitude.”
Well pardon this biased & bigoted Southern Baptist, but having an anti-Romney attitude is just plain common sense to me - on many levels.