Pinging the Annie Fans for a McCain SMACKDOWN.
On or off, ping me.
Cheers,
knewshound
Posted on 01/23/2008 2:57:16 PM PST by Syncro
She is for Romney, Syncro. You are pretty brave posting Coulter’s columns here.
:O)
Here's what's left of McCain after this column:
I'm a Fredhead who liked Hunter, so I know where you're coming from. I'm leaning towards Mitt, but it's hard to be enthusiastic for a guy on the basis that he has been lying politically for 12 years, and is now telling us the truth.
I voted for him because I thought McCain needed to be derailed. I liked Thompson a bit better, but felt he had no traction in Michigan, and derailing mcCain was more important to me. Now that Thomspon is gone, I actually feel good about my vote.
I like most of what Romney offers a lot, some not so much. He's not my perfect candidate for sure.
I now think he's the only candidate left I can support. McCain would be a disaster IMHO. Sitting out would just give us the Hag, and I'd never forgive myself for letting her win by default.
ping to your wonderful imge of “Patriot Ann” at post #4.
Bush denied that his campaign had anything to do with the alleged calls and, in a stunningly magnanimous act, ordered his campaign to release the script of the calls being made in South Carolina.
Bush asked McCain to do the same for his calls implying that Bush was an anti-Catholic bigot, but McCain refused. Instead, McCain responded with a campaign commercial calling Bush a liar on the order of Bill Clinton:
MCCAIN: His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We're all pretty tired of that.
ANNOUNCER: Do we really want another politician in the White House America can't trust?
After massive investigations by the Los Angeles Times and investigative reporter Byron York, among others, it turned out that neither of the alleged calls had been made by the Bush campaign -- nor, it appeared, by anyone else. There was no evidence that any such calls had ever been made, which is unheard of when hundreds of thousands of "robo-calls" are being left on answering machines across the state.
And yet, to this day, the media weep with McCain over Bush's underhanded tactics in the 2000 South Carolina primary.
In fact, the most vicious attack in the 2000 South Carolina primary came from McCain -- and not against his opponent.
Seeking even more favorable press from The New York Times, McCain launched an unprovoked attack against the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, calling them "agents of intolerance." Unlike the phantom "black love child" calls, there's documentary evidence of this smear campaign.
To ensure he would get full media coverage for that little gem, McCain alerted the networks in advance that he planned to attack their favorite whipping boys. Newspaper editors across the country stood in awe of McCain's raw bravery. The New York Times praised him in an editorial that said the Republican Party "has for too long been tied to the cramped ideology of the Falwells and the Robertsons."
Though McCain generally votes pro-life -- as his Arizona constituency requires -- he embraces the loony lingo of the pro-abortion set, repeatedly assuring his pals in the media that he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade because it would force women to undergo "illegal and dangerous operations."
Come to think of it, Dole is a million times better than McCain. Why not run him again?
COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111
Supporting none is supporting Hillary.
Yes McCain sucks, and needs to be defeated toot sweet.
One other thing. McQueeg constantly slams Donald Rumsfeld, who was forced out of office basically, by the Dems and turncoat Pubs like McCain. He still slams Rummy every chance he can. I find that despicable.
The biggest problem with McCaine, is that he is not a conservative, he hates conservatives, he hates US, he’s stuck it to us every chance he’s gotten since 2000. Screw him, he’s toast, he just doesn’t know it yet.
Why would you think he is telling the truth now?
Romney will be every bit the disaster Arnold Schwarzenegger has been in California. He can't be trusted on issue not to cave and work with the Democrats, which IS what did in Massachusetts. And, liberal Republican working with Democrats is the worst-case scenario.
Ann has been paying attention since 2000 to the legislative success of McCain. He was by far more successful in exacting revenge legislatively against conservatives than either of the Clintons have been thus far.
How many will fall for the 'Fairness Doctrine' candidate is yet to be determined, but he does have his legislative granted media pals.
It’s nice to see Ann return to form after last week’s dud. This one is a masterpiece! McCain is the favorite “maverick” of the socialist Democrat newsrooms, so why on earth would any real Republican want him?
There is little doubt the media want McCainiac because he'll be so easy to target if he gets the nomination. He really is the new Bob Dole. The media deliberately keeps 'Cain's transgressions under wraps in the hopes that he gets the nod--then they'll unleash there wrath on him.
Pinging you to this column just to make sure you didn’t miss it.
Ann has written here the best point-by-point manifesto against McCain that I have seen.
Brutal.
FRegards,
LH
Lets do a quick google test.
McCain didn't make the top 10 RINO list from Human Events I see which were Ranked by the editors.
John Gizzi is theri chief politcal editor. Oh lookee on their site from Gizzzard some puff pieces for McCain and bashing Romney.
Pat Buchanan was just on Sean Hannity today talking up Huckabee. He is a contributor at Human Events as well. Sounds like Human Events isn't the conservative authority it used to be.
Looking at why they put Romney on the list it was the 1992 quote he made about abortion. Sounds like the conservative conversion for me but not for thee crowd. Except it sounds like the editors of human events are shllling for McCain. Sounds like Human Events has been flippin. Seeing as McCain is the topic of this article by Ann I'll trust her over the editors who are shilling for him.
Btt.
You should read the thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.