Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

This is nuts! Public lands should be for recreation. I can understand keeping motorized vehicles out of some areas but not mountain bikes.


2 posted on 01/23/2008 9:58:38 AM PST by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo
Public lands should be for recreation.

Public means you are not allowed except by permission.

6 posted on 01/23/2008 10:03:45 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
To the green nazis, the whole point of the federal government is to legislate humanity out of existence, to let nature take back the world. I am not exaggerating.
30 posted on 01/23/2008 11:44:14 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
I can understand keeping motorized vehicles out of some areas but not mountain bikes.

I'll stick up for the environmentalists here. Wilderness areas are places to get away from the snowboard set. When hiking on a trail in the Collegiate Range in Colorado I had to dodge some swift bikers. It's not their place. They can bike in the city, as they aren't slowing down to look at the scenery.

The result of each user group should be considered. Wilderness should be for the most basic forms of transportation....and no frigging speakers.

63 posted on 01/23/2008 3:21:13 PM PST by Loud Mime (It is easier to wash dirt off your hands than blood = Gladiator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson