Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xcamel

The article raises a valid point, and nut just about retirees — anyone who has after-tax savings will pay tax on that money again when they spend it. It’s a drawback for the Fair Tax, no doubt; but you can’t have a major change, even a change for the better, without a transition.

This is the biggest negative for the Fair Tax. I’m not as starry-eyed as some Fair Tax proponents, but I still think the positives outweigh the negatives.


18 posted on 01/23/2008 3:50:59 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError
“Any asset held by a retiree that is to be liquidated for income in retirement will be subject to an additional 30% tax” —
20 posted on 01/23/2008 3:53:25 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: ReignOfError
anyone who has after-tax savings will pay tax on that money again when they spend it....even a change for the better, without a transition....This is the biggest negative for the Fair Tax.

Doesn't this problem go away, as people grow old and pass on? Eventually, there would be no one alive who paid in under the current tax scheme, and the problem dis appears, right?

50 posted on 01/23/2008 4:36:12 AM PST by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson