To: xcamel
The article raises a valid point, and nut just about retirees — anyone who has after-tax savings will pay tax on that money again when they spend it. It’s a drawback for the Fair Tax, no doubt; but you can’t have a major change, even a change for the better, without a transition.
This is the biggest negative for the Fair Tax. I’m not as starry-eyed as some Fair Tax proponents, but I still think the positives outweigh the negatives.
To: ReignOfError
“Any asset held by a retiree that is to be liquidated for income in retirement will be subject to an additional 30% tax” —
20 posted on
01/23/2008 3:53:25 AM PST by
xcamel
(Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
To: ReignOfError
anyone who has after-tax savings will pay tax on that money again when they spend it....even a change for the better, without a transition....This is the biggest negative for the Fair Tax. Doesn't this problem go away, as people grow old and pass on? Eventually, there would be no one alive who paid in under the current tax scheme, and the problem dis appears, right?
50 posted on
01/23/2008 4:36:12 AM PST by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson