Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Valentine
Fred lost half his support after he got in. Think about that. Half the people that wanted him to get in, to give up his private life to serve us and our needs left him when he got started. If I were him I would be disgusted with the fickled masses who said they wanted a conservative and then changed their minds when he had just started.

How many times did we hear someone on FR say that Fred was their first choice but they wanted their vote to count for stopping someone else, or they just wanted to vote for the poll perceived winner?

I understand and feel all the disappointment. I wish he had stayed in as well. But to criticize him to this extent now makes us no better than the other half that dumped on him for stupid reasons last year.

The fair weather conservatives let him down. We can’t blame this on one the RINO’s.

51 posted on 01/23/2008 12:39:47 PM PST by Bizhvywt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Bizhvywt

Agreed on all points, but the point I have tried to make over and over here is that the “strategic voting” that you allude to was about to end. The field was narrowing with the imminent departure of Huckabee from effective campaigning, and also Giuliani was also about tobecome a non-factor.

By the way have you heard that the Louisiana caucus yesterday would have been overwhelmingly Thompson’s and put him no. 1 or 2 in delegate count? As it turned out he quit hours before the gatherings in Louisiana and they went uncommitted instead.

Great timing, eh?


54 posted on 01/23/2008 7:13:16 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson