Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith

...who evidently have never heard of Halabja or Ansar al-Islam. I don't think this study need be taken very seriously.

5 posted on 01/22/2008 7:20:36 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
...who evidently have never heard of Halabja or Ansar al-Islam.

Well, presumably they meant following the first Gulf War, so Halabja (1988) wouldn't apply. But your second point is apt. Ansar al-Islam was a terrorist org, in Iraqi Kurdistan, JOINTLY RUN by al-Qaeda and Saddam's secret police, right up to the war. I never understood how the Senate Intel Committee, among others, ignored this in claiming there was NO "operational coordination" between al-Qaeda and Iraq. At least in Kurdistan there was.

60 posted on 01/23/2008 4:54:19 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson