Replies

That was President Reagan’s low point. He said he wasn’t proud of it, but he was never pro-abortion. He went from being no abortion unless the mother’s health was involved to being no abortion unless mother’s life was involved. He went from a pro-life to an even stronger pro-life position.

Mitt, on the other hand was absolutely and completely pro-abortion. He did not see why govt. should get involved with saving the child, he believed so strongly in a woman’s “right” to murder her child for whatever reason. Now, he changes his mind. The same mind he said was made up due to his mother’s pro-abortion position from the 1970’s. This great change of heart happens just before he decides to run for president.

How convenient. How fortuitous. How disingenuous.

You top that off with him wanting to put sodomites in the military and supporting Barney Frank’s ENDA legislation and you have ample enough reason to call this candidate a lib through and through.

I don’t vote for libs whether they have a (d) or an (r) next to their names.