I’m not going to vote for Mitt just because he’s not McCain. He’s going to have to convence me that he is the best man left. That’s not a high bar, but so far I don’t think he’s made it.
He is the least likely one to win in the general election IMO, so he has to prove that he isn’t a wolf in sheep’s skin. Both Rudy and McCain say “What you see is what you get.” Mitt says, “Don’t look at what I used to be; look at what I say.” I’m not buying it.
"I’m not going to vote for Mitt just because he’s not McCain. He’s going to have to convence me that he is the best man left. That’s not a high bar, but so far I don’t think he’s made it."
He is the best man left, and when I vote for him it will be FOR him and not a lesser-of-two-RINOs choice. This is what Mitt Romney ran on in 1994. see below. This "dont look at what I used to be" is bogus and you are right to look at his record. But there's been a lot of exaggerations of how much Mitt has changed. He has been a consistent fiscal and law-and-order conservative his whole political career. ... please, look at what Mitt Romney used to be, here, and if you like 80% of it, maybe he is enough of an improvement over Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain to be your candidate.
