So what’s your answer? Why should they obey a law prohibiting use of DNA at all over one prohibiting certain aspects of its use?
There’s a real narrow edge here. It’s very easy to slip over into the fever dreams of the conspiracy theorists. Once you’re in that dream, there is no escape, since any evidence whatsoever that might be presented tending to disprove the conspiracy just shows that those presenting the evidence are in on the conspiracy.
my post was rhetorical/sarcastic, but heres a good why.
How about the government get the hell outta joe citizens life instead of being in your face at every turn ?
we can have bs dna taken only from criminals, thatll be hunkydorey, cept the masters are inclined to make it illegal to object to 'voluntary' submission,lest youre hiding something...
raise an army, build some roads and build and man a damn fence and leave me the hell alone, thats gobmints real job...