Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The rest of 2008:

Romney-Thompson vs. Clinton-Obama = Uh oh. But it's not going to happen, so relax.

Romney-Thompson vs. Clinton-Richardson = 2 new Federalist/Strict Constructionist Supreme Court justices!

Romney-Thompson vs. Clinton-Clark = 2 new Federalist/Strict Constructionist Supreme Court justices!

Romney-Thompson vs. Obama-Anything = LANDSLIDE! 2 new Federalist/Strict Constructionist Supreme Court justices!

Ergo, for those of you with the option, work for / vote for Obama over Hillary.

I respect Obama's oratorial skills, although behind them lie McGovernik pisswater socialism (at best). I dig his stage skills under the TV lights the same way I dig Tiger Woods poise.

That said, this country is 20 years away from electing either a woman or an African-American on any ticket, unless they pair up. Fortunately, Madame Cankles is stupid & stubborn enough to piss that away. You're watching it right now.

1,165 posted on 01/22/2008 2:26:59 PM PST by StAnDeliver (This is the most important election in our lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 919 | View Replies ]


To: StAnDeliver

we will see if you are right.

I do think Clinton may well pick Richardson ... hispanic + NM + smart/reliable VP (a Dem Dick Cheney) is a smart move.

“Romney-Thompson vs. Clinton-Richardson = 2 new Federalist/Strict Constructionist Supreme Court justices!”

I hope you are right about that.


1,192 posted on 01/22/2008 2:42:02 PM PST by WOSG (Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson