The term "al Qaeda" is widely misused. It's practically a cliché. There are millions of Islamically-impaired individuals that hate us and yet are not card-carrying al Qaeda members. There are surely many small cells of dissatisfied Muslims, and individual Muslims with no cell, who also hate us. All they have to do is to shoot someone or blow something up, and everyone hollers, "Al Qaeda!". The term is a convenient euphemism for Islamic terrorists.
Whether we get Binnie or not, as long as we don't submit, we will be the targets of Islamic terrorism. It really doesn't matter much to the outcome, but getting Binnie will make us feel better, and it will give the Democrats one less thing to lie about.
The media and government have proclaimed that there have been no terrorist attacks on US soil since 9-11-2001.
We know this is false. Then they explain it as “just the work of lone nuts”.
Did we catch the “lone nut” who mailed the weaponized anthrax letters? If he died by his own hand, did he mail all of the anthrax he made or is some of it sitting out there somewhere?
How many lone nut snipers, shooters, suicide pilots, bombers, etc (like we have already seen) before we decide that the underlying hate is the issue and not “card carrying party affiliation” of the terrorists?
“Islamically impaired”-—a new syndrome discovered by the AMA?