Thanks for the update Doug. It’s interesting to watch this unfold.
bump
..for sometime after the election....
Just one minor correction, Doug. Time and Ms Novack aren’t pandering to Clinton apologists — they ARE Clinton apologists.
This is typical of how she slanted this tripe for the Clintons:
"Many of the individuals and groups helping Paul have long histories of Clinton-bashing or attacks on other Democrats. David Schippers, for example, who appears on tape, is the former chief investigative counsel for the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee during the 1998 Clinton impeachment hearings."
I asked Viveca, the disgraced TIME MAG reporter who got canned (that's how she would do it), if she knew the history of Schippers. She said yes, but when I waited for her to give me some info, it was not forthcoming. I informed her that Schippers was a lifelong Democrat, who worked in the Kennedy Justice Dept and helped take down the Chicago mob. In addition, he twice voted for Bill Clinton. I asked her if that might have been more fair to include that in her Schippers comments. Her response was that it was my opinin that such would be fair. Giving the false impression that Schippers was a Clinton-basher is totally unfair to a great American.
Viveca makes the determination of the financial condition without any background on her financial expertise. "Not exactly. It's pretty clear that it would have taken a lot more than $5 million from any investor to save Stan Lee Media." Actually, Peter intends to prove, through forensic accounting, that the $5 million would have indeed carried the company through until at least Jan. 20, 2001. That is when Bill Clinton would have come aboard the company. What do you think that would have done for the company, Viveca?
Viveca made not mention of the most critical part of the potential legal jeopardy for Hillary. Nowhere in her hit piece was there a mention that Kelly Craighead was a White House employee and AGENT of Hillary Clinton. Her agent was part of the direct solicitation of over a million dollars. That was illegal.
Hillary Clinton absolutely knew that the event cost over a million dollars. Her official spokesman acknowledged such in the WASHPOST. Viveca didn't tell you that.
Plain and simple, this is a deliberate hit piece orchestrated to harm the credibility of our film.
Hey, Viveca, Peter Paul is not the narrator of the film. Why didn't you just say you don't recall as you did to the OIC investigating the Plame matter?
This is a great quote. "And what it leaves out is often more important that what it tells us." Yes, Viveca, that is often true. You should live by that philosophy when evaluating someone else's work. You left out telling your bosses at TIME that you were being called to testify in the Plame case.
There is much more of this story to tell, and I'll do so shortly. If I owned factcheck.org, I think I would be tempted to do to Viveca what TIME did to her. Say adios.
Thanks for posting this doug, I read this report on factcheck.org and was going to ask you about it.
Good to see that factcheck was just blowing smoke.
INITIAL RESPONSE FOR FREEPERS HERE - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1959934/posts