Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/22/2008 5:37:12 AM PST by LonesomeHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: LonesomeHawk
This presshag wouldn't recognize a real man even if he jumped into her twin-sized bed.

Leni

77 posted on 01/22/2008 7:32:36 AM PST by MinuteGal (Fun Freepathon Contest (movies) Now Underway on Thread IV. Details # 19. ENTER NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonesomeHawk

“Electile Dysfunction”: the inability to become aroused over any of the leading
contenders for president put forth by either party in the 2008 election year.


83 posted on 01/22/2008 7:40:21 AM PST by tumblindice (Chuck Norris ends every relationship with, "It's not me, it's you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonesomeHawk

Then I hope the GOP is ready to splinter.


84 posted on 01/22/2008 7:41:40 AM PST by Centurion2000 (It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonesomeHawk

If Republicans were conservative, there’d be no contest and Fred would be on top.


89 posted on 01/22/2008 8:20:05 AM PST by DungeonMaster (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK, AND I USE IT TOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonesomeHawk

**A bystander in his own race, Thompson’s political what-could-have-been slipped through his fingers long before he announced his candidacy. “The process for running for president has begun so early,” says GOP political strategist Charlie Gerow, “that if you are not in the game, you are not in the game ... and Fred Thompson was never in the game.”**

Yeah, his ‘brilliant’ strategy backfired. We heard nothing but how ‘brilliant’ Fred was in entering when he did because people would get ‘bored’ of the other candidates. Well Mr. Boring himself actually got in the race and it was all downhill from there. This goes to show you how polls and being labelled an ‘electable’ candidate with ‘name recognition’ means squat. People knew who he was and saw and heard from him but showed how bad he was as a candidate in that his pathetic candidacy imploded. He had all the advantages except the man couldn’t back it up himself. And that is an example of ‘unelectable’ as there ever was. Face reality, “FredHeads”, in that Fred can’t win and isn’t viable. Move along and make excuses for another candidate you can make the ‘less of the evils’. No Mr. Perfects after all, right? And Fred was far from perfect unfortunately.


108 posted on 01/22/2008 9:19:24 AM PST by bushfamfan (KNUCKLEHEAD GOP NOT WORTHY OF DUNCAN HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson