Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian
But I really don’t think that demanding under pain of penalty that all citizens have health insurance is right though..

If you would bother to check the history of the Massachusetts plan, you will discover (as I did) that Romney had originally insisted on an opt-out clause where people could simply sign a form claiming they had the means to pay for their own personal health care, and thus would NOT rely on taxpayer funds to pay their hospital bills.

The 85% Democratic legislature balked, took OUT the waiver, and the two sides bickered for a long time.

Finally, after some horse trading, it got left in... but there STILL is a way a person can opt out...if I'm not mistaken.

DONT BELIEVE all the hysterical Romney hating hype on FR.

98% is out-of-context statements designed to make Romney look like a liberal, which he the farthest thing from...

177 posted on 01/22/2008 4:59:19 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Rock&RollRepublican

thanks...I did read where Romney vetoed the mandated and penalty fees for businesses who didn’t comply but the liderals in the legistlature overode it. I can see from reading more details that Romneys plan is intended in reducing costs so more people could afford healthcare. The liberals screwed with it quite a bit and then Romney gets the blame. I believe some conservatives are sort of knee jerk reactionary on some issues and judge quickly and really need to dig for the facts.


258 posted on 01/22/2008 8:36:58 AM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson