2008 Shakeup Time (Carl Cameron on Senator Thompson)

Fox News ^ | January 21, 2008 | Carl Cameron

[mkjessup]

It was Ribbed , but now I think we will need that reservoir tip afterall ...

Well you may be right, as it would seem the little pr*cks are out to get us. See my tagline, and have a good day.

[guitarist]

It’s true. McCain Romney Huck and Fred are all about 80% conservatives. Rudy is worse. But they are all a LOT better than the Dems. Why is this so hard for people here to see?

[DrewsDad]

Anyone who is trying to ban smoking at the Federal level does not understand the 10th Amendment(no, I'm not a smoker).

Honestly, if you are trying to help your candidate, you are hurting your cause by attacking Thompson(especially at this time). Your claims of him not being pro-life would make the NRTL and many other pro-life organizations look like fools for endorsing him. I trust their opinion much more than a random poster here listing third party info from a decade before.

Do you think that posting Wayne Dumond and 30-year wedding registry info on every Huckabee thread would make you more likely to support my candidate? All I'm saying is that you should consider your audience and rethink your approach.

[ejonesie22]

Uh huh...

[normy]

Huckabee and his Clintonesque tactics again. Dirtiest SOB in the race.

[ejonesie22]

To: All

Governor Huckabee is very conservative:

http://mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Issues.Home

16 posted on 01/22/2008 1:28:04 AM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate’s committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

You think Huckabee is conservative. You are a “Huckster”

If you are one to think that Huck is a conservative, well it is a good basis to judge anything else you say.

As far as the Pro life bit, between Dr. Wanda Franz and some guy on FR who thinks Huck is a conservative, well...

BTW Pro life, along with 2nd amend are the only conservative issues I see Huck support over the years, so if you are going on something that narrow, you are correct. I go much wider.

[Steamburg]

When there are Hucksters and McPains about accuracy suffers. I like discussion, but not in a Clinton style. I’m sorry too about the levels to which some members will sink and about how gullible many of have become because of the good postings and spirited discussion available here.

[Sir Gawain]

I’m talking about the source of Carl’s statement. What is his source? Are you dense?

[Nonstatist]

What’s that supposed to mean?

It means, he's not the perfect conservative , but its hard to be fervent about "imperfect", so you have to pretend he is , so that you can paint everyone else as being RINO's. Get it now?

BTW, I think his Federalism argument is an excellent one and he is the best of the bunch, but unfortunately, he never caught on in the places where he said he would. But thats just the way it goes sometimes.

[haircutter]

I don’t follow HUCKBEE post.....
have better things to do......

[Mr. Mojo]

OK Carl you have laid it on the line. Your reputation is at stake. We will know in a few days if you are full of it or have good sources.

Looks like Carl's sources are reliable.