Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
[-————You will notice the difference on the WOT and on who gets nominated for the Supreme Court.-————]

No you won’t. There’s quite a bit of both anecdotal as well as actual evidence that McCain won’t nominate constitutionalist judges to the SCOTUS. And nobody’s gonna pull us out of Iraq. Nobody wants “defeat” as part of their legacy. Even the media isn’t powerful enough to cover that one up. Pullout would = defacto defeat. Obama doesn’t want defeat as his legacy. Hillary doesn’t want it as hers. The current congress could’ve pulled us out over a year ago, but didn’t. This should tell everybody, especially a freeper who pays attention, that all this is is political posturing. If they could saddle bush with a defeat, great. But they don’t want it on their dole. And it doesn’t matter who wins; McCain, Obama, or Hillary. Gitmo terrorists are already guaranteed constitutional rights. So there’s no difference.

First, no Democratic President is going to be able to stay in Iraq and get reelected.

What blocked the Democratic Congress was Bush's determination.

Second, if you think there is no difference between McCain and the Democrats then you shouldn't vote.

But McCain is far better then any Democrat in many areas, such as pro-life, national defense and spending.

209 posted on 02/12/2008 3:39:29 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration

-————First, no Democratic President is going to be able to stay in Iraq and get reelected.————

No president who leads a nation to defeat can get re-elected. Period. Not with a busted-monopoly-media.

Just think “the defeat president”. It simply cannot happen, unless the opposition puts forth someone so bad, who runs such a horrible campaign, who utterly fails to inspire. And gets caught in a murder or something.

-———What blocked the Democratic Congress was Bush’s determination.-————

What will block a democratic president will be a portion of congress.

Nobody will try to stop a liberal mccain pushing liberal legislations.

-———Second, if you think there is no difference between McCain and the Democrats then you shouldn’t vote.—————

I see a difference, a clear difference. In this instance, the D is better. They’re pretty close to being openly liberal. McCain stabs us in the back, then claims to be one of us, and expects us to grant him amnesty.

———But McCain is far better then any Democrat in many areas, such as pro-life, national defense and spending.-————

Life yes, ND most likely, and spending probably not. He is a fiscal nightmare considering McCain Lieberman.

And my original comment, I stand by it. McCain’s unlikely nominate constitutional judges who are going to overturn his babies; his major bills.


216 posted on 02/12/2008 4:44:28 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Juan Hernandez = Mexico First, therefore McCain = Mexico First. There's no way I can vote McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson