"Ayi don' need no steenkin' conservatives!"
Posted on 01/21/2008 4:16:25 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
“Go Back to DU” ...great debating point. Grow up!!
DeLay left Washington under a cloud, one brought about by a out of control highly partisan 'Rat prosecutor in Texas. The liberal MSM picked up on it ... DeLay had given the 'Rats a very hard time for several years ... and, with all force possible, pushed him out of office. This, brought about in large measure by the pubbies abandoning him ... which they do with distressing frequency whenever one of their own is the focus of the MSM. As an aside ... the 'Rats circle the wagons whenever one of their brethren comes under fire for some reason ... the pubbies, on the other hand, quickly abandon their people under similar circumstances.
Bottom line ... the prosecutor that brought up the highly suspect accusations against DeLay couldn't make them stick ... but the damage was already done.
There is something shady about Tom Delay. I didn’t appreciate how he threw away his congressional seat in Texas because of his greedy need to be a lobbyist.
Aw geesh, barryg, and to think I was going to be nicer to you.
Shame on me.
Check today’s posting history before you tell me to grow up! Newbs spouting dem talking points would be better off easing in instead of antagonizing!
Hahahaha! GTMA!
If the conservative Constitution Party is not headed on the ticket by a minor league nutcase nobody heard of, but a solid, nationally recognized conservative who could in fact be President, that is where I would probably end up. No McCAIN. No HILARY. Same difference. THE G.O.P. has been warned.
Most Republicans did; Souter was nominated by GHWB, and presented himself as “not a liberal”; he was an unknown entity.
Ginsburg was nominated by Clinton and at that time the Senate pretty much believed that since he was president, he got to pick his justices.
Of course, “turnabout is fair play” doesn’t fly with the RATs. They’re thugs.
He is manna to the RINO. Never met one he didn’t like.
"Ayi don' need no steenkin' conservatives!"
I don't think so. Bill was a good time rock and roller. To him, being the President and being treated like a rock star was what it was all about. Hillary is a Marxist, Feminist lesbian. She wants to do stuff, like universal health care, more government control, getting rid of weapons, federalization of everything. Bill loves campaigning because he gets a kick out of the adulation; Hillary endures it because she wants the power.
Borders? We don need no steenking borders.
"He could f--k up a two-car funeral."
Well, get ready for it. Because the Hillary will be president.
Yep. All done, but for the wailing and gnashing...
In my more tin-foil hat moments, I wonder if Clinton and Bush didn't make a deal in 2000. It's pretty obvious to anyone who pays attention that Broward County was the location where the election was going to be stolen (wait until the ballots are almost all in, start manufacturing votes, but just enough to win) but they stopped 500 votes short. The Clintons kneecap Gore, then do the same to Kerry, and Bush selects a VP that has no ambition of running for President, and leaves the Pubbies without an heir. Clinton and Bush the elder have also become very friendly. Just a nutty thought.
Looks like all the wailing and gnashing ought to be going full steam by dawn.
Trancredo said the same thing.
me too.
With all due respect, it's not irrational.
There are plenty of perfectly rational reasons for objecting to a McCain candidacy. For example...
a. The First Amendment
b. Illegal immigration
c. Global warming
d. The Fairness Doctrine
e. Tax policy
f. Judicial appointments
g. Temperament
h. Opportunism
Need I go on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.