You: "he’s a non-issue in this presidential race...a conversation piece at best and if he breaks off I think he’ll carry more left wing youngsters than anything else."
BTW, we're NOT race-baiting. We're discussing the obvious discrepancies between statements made out of both sides of RuePaul's mouth; whether through newsletter articles or statements such as the above. Such is fair game, and not race-baiting.
You want to support a candidate who has no problem accepting support and contributions from Truthers and racists, live with the consequences.
I find that disgusting coming from so called conservatives.
Ron Paul is a nobody and white supremacists are maybe 1/10,000th of the “right wing” electorate.
So why are you here trying to smear Paul and his supporters by association if not to preen for your own need to be self righteous.
I see this over and over here, conservatives who use race for the same self righteousness as Dems do.
Some even work together in groups...seminar callers as Rush calls them. Provocateurs with their own identity driven objectives....they run in packs on Southern threads
The reality is King did indeed talk about a color blind society but truthfully nobody wants it. The tool of race baiting is too mighty a siren for folks to feel that thirst to feel morally superior to the man/woman sitting next to them.
The new church lady of Saturday Night Live....a smug self righteous morally superior on everything race freeper.
That on a conservative forum folks tout the completely nonconservative MLK to bash a fellow GOPer say plenty.
So what if Paul may not be crazy about King? That is hardly the stamp of a white supremacist by itself.
Do you pursue racists of color with such vigor?