Posted on 01/20/2008 10:15:05 PM PST by FocusNexus
The Jan. 29 contest in Florida will be the first Republican primary closed to independent voters, who have provided McCain with his margins of victory in both New Hampshire and South Carolina. A victory, strategists agreed, would stamp McCain as the front-runner in what has been a muddied Republican race and give him a clear advantage heading toward Super Tuesday on Feb. 5.
Florida has played a pivotal role in the past two general elections and now is poised to help determine who the Republicans will send into the main event this November. The primary looms as a potential showdown in the GOP nomination battle not only because of its size and importance but because it will be the first this year in which all the leading candidates are competing.
Florida will award 57 delegates on a winner-take-all basis next week, the most of any state to date. The Republican National Committee penalized the state, cutting its delegate slate in half, because officials moved up the date of the primary. But by the time of the national convention this summer, it is possible that all 114 delegates will be awarded to the winner.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Brief Overview of Congressman Pauls Record:
He has NEVER voted to raise taxes.
He has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has NEVER voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has NEVER voted to raise congressional pay.
He has NEVER taken a government-paid junket.
He has NEVER voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He DOES NOT participate in the lucrative congressional pension program (!!)
He RETURNS a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year!
MITT ROMNEY for President!
Proamnesty-antiBushtaxcuts-proCO2caps-CFR-RINO John McCain delenda est!
Government may be the problem, but Ron Paul certainly is not the solution.
“Government may be the problem, but Ron Paul certainly is not the solution.”
The RINOcrats sure aren’t!
I never hear about dead people voting republican. Why do they always seem to vote democrat?
Because that’s the way the devil makes them vote!
I was thinking more along the lines of them not having to pay taxes, so why should they care how it’s spent? But then, you may be right. lol
They might very well “vote” for a RINO in an open primary.
“They might very well vote for a RINO in an open primary.”
I don’t know. They might just sit this one out. Too many choices.
Romney’s Position Pleased Liberal Barney Frank.
“’I was very pleased,’ Frank said afterward. ‘Here you have a freshman governor refusing to endorse a tax cut presented by a Republican president at the height of his wartime popularity.’” (Wayne Washington and Glen Johnson, “Romney Weighs In - Carefully - On Bush Tax Cut Plan; Governor Won’t Give His Endorsement,” Boston Globe, 4/11/03)
http://www.earnedmedia.org/fred0106.htm
MR. RUSSERT: How many troops do we have overseas right now?
REP. PAUL: I dont know the exact number, but more than we need. We dont need any.
MR. RUSSERT: Its 572,000. And youd bring them all home?
REP. PAUL: As quickly as possible. Wethey will not serve our interests to be overseas. They get us into trouble. And we can defend this country without troops in Germany, troops in Japan. How do they help our national defense? Doesnt make any sense to me. Troops in Korea since Ive been in high school?
MR. RUSSERT: So if Iran invaded Israel, what do we do?
REP. PAUL: Well, theyre not going to. That is like saying Iran is about to invade Mars. I mean, they have nothing. They dont have an army or navy or air force. And Israelis have 300 nuclear weapons. Nobody would touch them. But, no, if, if it were in our national security interests and Congress says, You know, this is very, very important, we have to declare war. But presidents dont have the authority to go to war
Iran Military Guide
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/
“CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . I’m tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?
HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we don’t have that in place. It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight. But you know, for top level policy there’s not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isn’t going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.
JACK BLOOD, GUEST HOST: I think it’s fair to say that of all the candidates out there, the one most interested in reopening the investigation and clearing the questions is Dr. Paul; and you should be commended for that.
“REP. PAUL: As quickly as possible. Wethey will not serve our interests to be overseas. They get us into trouble. And we can defend this country without troops in Germany, troops in Japan. How do they help our national defense? Doesnt make any sense to me. Troops in Korea since Ive been in high school?”
He’s right.
Half a million overseas - and none protecting the border.
Why do we need huge standing bases in Europe? 50,000 in Korea? That’s not enough to repel a North Korean army invasion. They are sitting ducks.
Can you say DUH?
How could Iran INVADE Israel? They are not geographically close. Do you think the Iranians could support those kind of supply lines? Seen a map lately?
“But, no, if, if it were in our national security interests and Congress says, You know, this is very, very important, we have to declare war. But presidents dont have the authority to go to war.”
Thanks for that quote! As you see, he’s not “anti-war.”
“HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we dont have that in place. It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight. But you know, for top level policy theres not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isnt going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.”
Take a look at the 2nd paragraph on p.172 of the 911 commission report.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
It says that the source of funding for the 911 attacks was never identified, but that “Ultimately the question is of little practical significance.”
Do you really think that where the terrorists got their money is of no significance???
Michael Meacher isn’t a ‘troofer’ - he wrote about how foreign intelligence services, specifically the ISI, was double-dealing - working with us while funding Al Qaeda.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,1266511,00.html
After all, they were already funding the Taleban - and continue to protect them from us in their tribal regions. Meanwhile we send the Pakis millions in arms.
Theres nobody in this world that could possibly attack us today. I mean, we could defend this country with a few good submarines. -Ron Paul
No thanks.
He’s talking about a country invading us.
If they did, they’d have to have supply lines and mobilize troops.
This statement is taken way out of context.
Do you think Iran is going to stage a land invasion? North Korea?
How does having half a million troops garrisoned overseas protect us at home?
We can’t even protect our own border right now!
How do troops in Germany protect us from terrorists operating here?
Think about it.
This conservative is going with Mitt.
Mitt is my second choice. My first choice isn’t doing so well. I’m still backing him but by the time the primaries get to my state I might be down to my second choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.