Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Tell
Yeah, I support a rule book that lists what weapons are not allowed to be owned by the citizenry and I think the rule book should be written by elected officials and in compliance with the 2nd amendment. Because the day this country lets folks walk around with heavy weaponry OR the day it forbids private semi-auto assault weaponry ownership and concealed carry, it is finished.

The constitution is useless if you interpret in such a way as to destroy the country it is meant to govern.

173 posted on 01/21/2008 6:41:24 PM PST by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: mbraynard
mbraynard said: "The constitution is useless if you interpret in such a way as to destroy the country it is meant to govern."

Please tell me the date on which a rulebook became necessary. I don't believe that such a rulebook was necessary when the Bill of Rights was ratified. How do you justify imposing a rulebook without the benefit of a Constitutional amendment?

Those of us who do not fear arms in the hands of the law-abiding, and who recognize that the non-law-abiding will ignore such laws, do not see the need for such a rulebook. There is no power on earth that can disarm evil people without destroying them.

179 posted on 01/21/2008 10:02:44 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson