Posted on 01/20/2008 6:57:25 AM PST by skully
And you’re going to do that with Alan Keyes?
The choice is clear: Mitt Romney
Defeating Romney would mean the next president will be Hillary or Obama, or possibly McCain. That’s a great plan to defeat liberals you have there, genius.
I know JimRob and most FReepers loathe Rudy, but to call him a flip flopper is ridiculous. I don’t agree with most of his beliefs, but I do respect him for not lying about them to us.
Huck is the opposite of this. I get the impression that he’ll say anything to anyone about his positions if it’ll further his chances at winning - which is why I trust him about as much as I trust the Clintons (which means not at all).
You actually think the South will vote for Hillary or Obama over Romney? What are you smoking?
I will vote for Fred on 2/5.
"Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair. The rest is in the hands of God." - George Washington
Our duty is not to win. That's up to God. Our job is to be faithful to raise the standard, and to give the people a choice. What they do with that choice is up to them.
You got me! Those two should be running as Democrats! Why Fred has gained no traction is beyond me.
Thank you. Ann is Hi-Larious.
Choosing the supposed lesser of two evils still leaves you in the hands of evil at the end of the day.
If that is the outcome, it will be the fault of people like you, not people like me.
I agree with you. If Fred continues he may be able to broker the GOP Convention and Party Platform to take a stand for TRUE Conservatives.
But I am still voting for him on Super Tuesday. That day will define exactly how divided or united the GOP really is.
As much as I would hate it for McKennedy to get it over Thompson, at least McKennedy may protect our gun rights and Rombomb will absolutely not. The 2nd amendment is at stake here. It is in the US Supreme Court right now and we need to ensure appointment of Constitutionalist judges. So I will be there to pull his level if he is who we have. I would much rather do it for him than a gun-grabbing socialist. And a vote not cast is one given to the Hildabest.
I don't know that he's a flip-flopper. But he is either a noob to the Conservative movement or he threw his core beliefs out the window while in office.
You named four liberals.
I'll vote third party or write-in.
I'm with you FRiend! Hucklebee is already waning & McCain ONLY won S. Carolina because the Independents voted for him. Think about it - it wasn't that many months ago that McCain's numbers were almost zero & everyone thought he was washed up - there's still hope for Fred & as long as he's willing to fight, I'm with him.
Fred's a real patriot & he will know when he is at the point where he can no longer compete. I trust his judgment & I'm not giving up the fight just yet!
“Choosing the supposed lesser of two evils still leaves you in the hands of evil at the end of the day.
If that is the outcome, it will be the fault of people like you, not people like me.”
Voting for the lesser of two evils gives you a chance that the lesser of two evils might prevail. By not voting, you are doing nothing to stop the greater evil from winning out.
Whether you label them or not, one of them is going to be the next president. Take your pick.
Until folks start simply voting for the best candidate instead of being led around by the nose by the media and the party gatekeepers, you’re going to keep getting snookered into lesser of two evil situations. Refuse to play their game and you’re halfway to defeating them. After all, they can’t win without the suckers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.