Conceptions and intricacies are totally different.
IMO, since the FT publications are out there and you seem to be an economic guru it would be up to you to debunk what the authors wrote instead of demanding that supporters rewrite the plan for your benefit.
C’mon, you have problems with the plan, prove that you’re n ot conceptually challenged by using, say, some math equations, logic, etc.
You seem to wanna play the tax technician, show us with math that the Fair Tax claims are wrong.
I’ll admit that I can’t do it.
So either show you can or admit you can’t.
It ain't fair until it is fair for me, too. Is that too hard to comprehend?