FairTax cut for 2-parent families

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 19, 2008 | Howard and Raymond Richman

[Paladin2]

It was a stupid question in that it was so broad as to cover everybody. Typical of conspiracy mavens.

Sounds like you are old enough to know that when someone approaches and says "I'm with the gov't and am here to help you" you want to make sure your exit is clear.

[Paladin2]

Now THAT’s funny.

[groanup]

Nothing craven about it.

I'm suggesting nothing in the Constitution authorizes such a stipend.

What part authorizes the payroll tax?

[Turret Gunner A20]

considering how the HR 25 bill allows the GOVERNMENT to define legally approved families. The sexual recreation lobby will work overtime to go heather has two mommies/two daddies.

They do it now don't they?

And piss on the pervert lobby.

[groanup]

Just imagine if the FairTax had been quoted as 30% from the beginning. These interlopers would have accused AFFT of misleading in that case as well. They don’t have valid arguments, they are trying to protect their turf.

[Mojave]

I'm suggesting nothing in the Constitution authorizes such a stipend.

You're "suggesting" that the Fair Tax scam is unconstitutional?

Good for you!

[Paladin2]

The “prebate” makes the Fair Tax proposal a graduated system, doesn’t it?

The FT isn't graduated yet, it has a lot of work to do yet to be fair and at the current rate of improvement of deficiencies is not likely to ever graduate.

[groanup]

It was a stupid question in that it was so broad as to cover everybody.

That's evading the question. Typical.

[Turret Gunner A20]

You’re not going to make it with those two jackasses.

[Turret Gunner A20]

a system with a sucess penalty with at its heart a monthly check based on “from each according to their ability to each according to their needs”

When are you going to quit lying?

[e_castillo]

Not to be picky but...

30 percent of 1 dollar is 33 cents... Nothing is fact until it’s a written law.

[Paladin2]

"The difference is that you have the control over what you do with, and how much you pay from, each paycheck under the FairTax."

Pure illogic. If you have a choice to not buy food and fuel each month, you also have a choice of not going to work. You are free to not pay the income tax by avoiding (evading for the English challenged on these threads) income. Same as avoiding (evading for you statists) a sales tax by not buying.

[Turret Gunner A20]

QQQQQQPS!!!! Winter time I have to modify -- you did finally get through to Proud2BeRight. Good job.

[Paladin2]

"Nothing is fact until it’s a written law."

Pure BS. Passing a law that pi=3 doesn't make it so. Passing a law that the national speed limit is 55mph doesn't make it so either.

[DivaDelMar]

So, you’re not indentured to anyone?

Do you work? How do you earn a living?

Fail to pay your taxes and see how long you keep your home, business, bank/brokerage accounts.

You are indentured servant, you just don’t realize it.

[Paladin2]

Need an example of FT logic?

Got one right here:

"You’re not going to make it with those two jackasses."

Correct. I don't have sex using the computer.

[Paladin2]

"People who are against change are like those who P*ss against the wind.... These folks are either reliant on the feds for thier income or are actually retired and are afraid of their own shadow. "

Wrong. You can piss against the wind. You just have to be a strong pisser. I'd suggest that the Founders were considered to be pissing into the wind by many.

[Paladin2]

They are mooching off their parents, no need to spend.

[Mojave]

They are mooching off their parents, no need to spend.

But they'll still get a monthly stipend!

[Turret Gunner A20]

If it were better for everyone, it’d be done already.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! THAT'S THE BEST ONE YET!!

Whom do you think would have done it to make it better for everyone? The Clintons? The Kennedys? Pelosi and Reid?

Get real.