Well, sometimes less is more. Less govenment, less regulation, less taxes (personal and corporate).
That being said, imho, the real issue which is not being highlighted or even discussed at this point is the SCOTUS. 2008 is all about the SCOTUS.
Judge Robert Bork endorsed Mitt Romney. That’s a huge endorsement, imho.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Bork_Endorses_Romney/2007/12/15/57308.html
[Noted conservative jurist Judge Robert Bork endorsed Governor Mitt Romney for President of the United States Saturday.
Joining Romney for President, Judge Bork said, “Throughout my career, I have had the honor of serving under several Presidents and am proud to make today’s endorsement. No other candidate will do more to advance the conservative judicial movement than Governor Mitt Romney. He knows firsthand how the judicial branch can profoundly affect the future course of a state and a nation. I greatly admired his leadership in Massachusetts in the way that he responded to the activist court’s ruling legalizing same-sex ‘marriage.’ His leadership on the issue has served as a model to the nation on how to respect all of our citizens while respecting the rule of law at the same time.”
Judge Bork continued, “Our next President may be called upon to make more than one Supreme Court nomination, and Governor Romney is committed to nominating judges who take their oath of office seriously and respect the rule of law in our nation. I also support Governor Romney because of his character, his integrity and his stands on the major issues facing the United States.”]
Now I think an equally important endorsement of Mitt re the Supreme Court came from esteemed law professor Douglas W. Kmiec. When I saw his endorsement, it was a turning point for me in becoming a Romney supporter.