Romney’s a pro-choice Mass liberal. I’m not voting for him.
As far as my support, I’m faithful to the Declaration and the Constitution, not to some party. Like it or not, Ron Paul is more consistent in that regard than anyone else. He has his flaws (BIG ONES), but he’s light years better than a RINO, especially on domestic policy.
Goldwater lives! That’s where I’ll go if Thompson doesn’t make it.
I think Romney has taken some positions in Mass, which he needed to take, in order to win there.
George Bush, has taken some postions, which I’m still furious about, but he’s a darn sight better than Kerry would have been.
I’ll confess to being more libertarian, than many here, and I don’t mean to express anything other than my honest belief, that Romney seems to this poster, to have the qulities to be an excellent President.
And he can win.
He can beat Hillary. He can beat Obama.
With the right VP, he could inspire many here on this board, who seem to be doing to Romney, exactly what we’ve seen others doing to Hunter, and Fred Thompson.
Winning matters.
Perhaps. But is domestic policy the ultimate issue?
It may seem trite, but in the end I think it boils down to:
You wake up one day next year and the headlines say "Iran has the Bomb!". Whom do you want in the Oval Office that day?
You may disagree, but for me THAT trumps all my discontent with the GOP candidates on domestic issues. It scares me to death thinking of Hillary or Obama in charge of national security.
oh Please, don’t bring rue paul in. Rue Paul is a moron, as is his cult. Lets talk about what the party needs to do sans dr.leary.