Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: County Agent Hank Kimball; luvadavi
If only the fifteen percent of the party that has supported Fred would have thrown its support behind the <1 percent of the party that has supported Hunter, Hunter would be doing better? Is THAT what you're saying?

luvadavi is right.

What you need to do is add Fred and Huck together to start to see the Conservative potential. Had Fred captured the Christian vote, this would be no contest. Replace Fred with Hunter and it would have been even better in SC, as Hunter had the military credentials that would have opposed McCain.

That is why I have been preaching the Reagan Coalition for so long: "Strong Military", "Fiscal Conservatism/libertarianism", and "Social Conservatism".

Fred owns only one of those pillars.

114 posted on 01/19/2008 11:24:37 PM PST by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: roamer_1

????? Fred is the ONLY candidate that has had all three.

NRTL endorsement and strong on 2nd Amendment. Also shepherded Bush judicial nominations through the Senate.

Supported Bush tax cuts and FURTHER tax cuts.

Strong on defense spending, supports our Iraq efforts, doesn’t want to close Guantanamo, doesn’t whine about waterboarding.

What am I missing here?

Hank


115 posted on 01/19/2008 11:32:58 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball ("Huckabee is the bastard child of Lou Dobbs and Pat Robertson." - Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: roamer_1

Youre right. And this would have worked, well.


119 posted on 01/20/2008 12:12:21 AM PST by luvadavi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson