Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: timm22
The only reason to ban smoking in a certain location is second hand smoke. What's the danger of second hand smoke outside?

Nope, bogus law.

36 posted on 01/19/2008 9:20:21 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Fred, fry Huck and McCain like a squirrel in a popcorn popper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
The only reason to ban smoking in a certain location is second hand smoke. What's the danger of second hand smoke outside? Nope, bogus law.

Generally, I would agree with you. But the ban mentioned in the articles covers the sidewalks, alleys, and pedestrian spaces of a downtown area. Downtown areas are usually crowded, so even though it's outside the likelihood of inhaling someone's smoke is more than negligible.

If the ban covered parks or suburban areas I would agree with you. After all, if the nonsmoker is bothered they can just go to another park bench. In a downtown area, though, I don't know if it's fair to expect someone to cross the street to avoid the smoker standing on the sidewalk in front of a bar.

45 posted on 01/19/2008 10:10:35 PM PST by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson