Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: timm22
Now, let me at least partially redeem myself. Although a smoking ban in the public parts of a downtown area may be legitimate, and even reasonable, I don't think they are practical. What I mean is, while this is an issue that should be open to a vote, I would vote against it.

Yes, a person should be able to walk on the sidewalks without being subjected to a nuisance like tobacco smoke. But smokers make up a declining minority of the population, so how often is a pedestrian really going to be inconvenienced? To me, it would make more sense just to take the long way around a smoker every once in a while than to subject innocent and unsuspecting visitors in my city to a draconian fine.... simply for engaging in an otherwise-legal activity.

31 posted on 01/19/2008 9:10:00 PM PST by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: timm22
What I mean is, while this is an issue that should be open to a vote, I would vote against it.

You don't get it do you my man? If the people voted that conservatives on forums like us advocating for limited government should be rounded up and shot point blank would you line up next to me and go along? It's democracy after all. The people have spoken.

Photobucket

34 posted on 01/19/2008 9:19:15 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson