Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite a disappointing finish, Thompson doesn't bow out
Chicago Tribune ^ | Jan. 19, 2008 | William Douglas

Posted on 01/19/2008 6:31:23 PM PST by FocusNexus

Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson didn't drop out of the Republican presidential field after his disappointing finish in Saturday's South Carolina primary -- but he sounded close to it.

About an hour after the polls closed, Thompson addressed a ballroom in a college student union, an event that featured as many students enjoying free beer as it did hardcore Thompson supporters. He delivered a lengthy soliloquy, speaking in the past tense about "clear conservatism," the cornerstone of his campaign.

"My friends, we will always be bound by a close bond because we have traveled a very special road together for a very special purpose," Thompson told the crowd. "It's never even been about me, it's never been about you. It's been about our country."

Thompson's campaign declined to say whether the speech was a concession, a swan song, a stump speech to signal that he's fighting on, or what. Campaign spokesmen wouldn't say what the former Tennessee senator's next move is.

"The campaign is still a campaign until it's not the campaign," said Rich Galen, a Thompson campaign senior adviser. "There's no hurry to make a decision, other than your deadline. I don't have anything to add -- not tonight."

Thompson conceded earlier Saturday that he needed a win in South Carolina to keep his presidential campaign alive.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; gopprimary; sc2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-280 next last
To: Clintonfatigued
That was pretty much a given from the onset.

Seriously, I don't understand the appeal of Fred Thompson at FR.

81 posted on 01/19/2008 7:24:54 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: devere

“Watching John McCain’s love-fest with Lindsay Graham turned my stomach.”

Just to many things that turn my stomach about McQueeg. He is just one step away from being a dimocRAT. He almost became one by being Kerry’s running mate.


82 posted on 01/19/2008 7:25:45 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: balch3

“he should consider third party if necessary.”

He might even win third party. A lot of conservatives won’t show up given the clown show now in place.


83 posted on 01/19/2008 7:27:17 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I'll be voting for Romney on Super Tuesday, I don't give a crap whether McCain can beat Hillary or not.

It doesn't make one bit of a difference, aside from Thompson, not one of them could hold a debate against her. Not one of them.

84 posted on 01/19/2008 7:28:24 PM PST by ShadowDancer (Alcoholism is a disease, but it’s the only disease that you can get yelled at for having.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: inkling

If Fred was not in this race, Huckabee wins by 5 points or more. Fred is doing his job as surrogate to McCain.


85 posted on 01/19/2008 7:29:21 PM PST by wastedpotential (A Reagan Bush conservative from OH and ..... an unashamed Huckabee supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Fred ain’t the nominee, and “we” is done. I’ll not stand by and watch my party hijacked by the left.


86 posted on 01/19/2008 7:29:41 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

“He might even win third party. A lot of conservatives won’t show up given the clown show now in place.”

And how exactly would the math work on a 3rd party run by Fred. He’s only polling 12% nationally, he’s not going to get much of a crossover vote, and he can’t get enough GOP votes to even place in SC.


87 posted on 01/19/2008 7:30:39 PM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"Same difference. I wonder who Reagan voted for in 76. I bet he didn't piss and moan and stay home. I'll betcha he voted for Ford. Don't you think? And wasn't Ford a liberal GOPer from the Rockefeller wing?"

And who lost the election, bud ? Put up a liberal RINO against a liberal rodent and take a wild guess who wins.

88 posted on 01/19/2008 7:31:37 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"Accepting the results of a contest is not selling out. It's being an adult."

"Accepting" is one thing, aiding and abetting is quite another. I will not assist the hijacking of our party by the left. That's that.

89 posted on 01/19/2008 7:33:25 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
And who lost the election, bud ? Put up a liberal RINO against a liberal rodent and take a wild guess who wins.

The nominee is determined in the primaries. Once a nominee is picked, the choice is pretty clear. Then you let the chips fall.

So, what do you think Reagan did? Think he stayed home?

90 posted on 01/19/2008 7:33:45 PM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; jellybean; Josh Painter; ejonesie22; papasmurf; Bobbisox; DesScorp; thefactor; ...

Dear Senator Thompson:

Please do NOT drop out of the race! You are the ONLY conservative running this year, so we need you to stay in and fight for us. I have bundled over $40,000 for your campaign, wrote numerous letters, phoned, contacted friends and more and I’ve never done anything like that before, because I didn’t have someone I believed in this much. We asked you to run, and we’re asking you to keep running. We’ll find the money! Thank you!

Fred


91 posted on 01/19/2008 7:34:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“I wonder who Reagan voted for in 76.”

I don’t know, but George McGovern revealed that he voted for Gerald Ford!


92 posted on 01/19/2008 7:34:12 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
I think I know where your coming from....
You are a republican first.....
a conservative second...
You'd vote for Donald Duck if he had an (R) behind his name..

What u may not have realize yet...is this is a conservative site first...Not a republican site...No offense meant...just an observation

93 posted on 01/19/2008 7:34:21 PM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wastedpotential
If Fred was not in this race, Huckabee wins by 5 points or more. Fred is doing his job as surrogate to McCain.

And if Huck wasn't in, Fred would have won. A lot of people think Huck is in it to be McCain's veep. That's why Huck never criticizes him.

94 posted on 01/19/2008 7:34:33 PM PST by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
"Accepting" is one thing, aiding and abetting is quite another. I will not assist the hijacking of our party by the left. That's that.

No, instead you'll choose the "hijacking" of our country. Talk about cutting off yer nose to spite yer face. Not smart.

95 posted on 01/19/2008 7:35:04 PM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob

[And how exactly would the math work on a 3rd party run by Fred. ]

I’m obviously not betting the farm on it. But say McCain is the nominee by plurality. That could mean two thirds of Republicans never voted for him, and he’d be running to the center. That means the Mitt, Huckabee and even Giuliani votes would be up for grabs. Plus the rare sane Democrat.


96 posted on 01/19/2008 7:35:34 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

I’m sticking with Fred. I hope he stays with it. If he’s got the money, he might as well continue. Someone has to stay and fight for conservative principles and cause “the Republican Party to look in the mirror” as Fred said. I’d love to see him in the Florida debate holding the RINOs feet to the fire.


97 posted on 01/19/2008 7:36:12 PM PST by chickpundit (This chick's for Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captain_dave; Paladin2; Jim Robinson
I sent in the maximum contribution amount to his campaign. Send some money to Fred to let him know we want him in to the end.

Cap'n, your post just inspired me to donate again to Thompson. I'm pinging Jim Robinson on this because I think that now is exactly WHEN we Fred supporters should send him some dough just to let him know that we want him to keep pluggin'. Right now, in these immediate hours after the SC primary, is when our $ support will give Fred and his team the most moral support.

Donations right now, more than any other time, will convey a very powerful message from we true conservatives. In this primary, I will ONLY vote for Thompson, even if I have to write him in (if that's an option!). Otherwise, I'll pass. There is no second choice.

98 posted on 01/19/2008 7:36:46 PM PST by Finny (FOX News: "We report only what we like. You decide based on what we decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I kind of think that is what Fred has been doing (helping McCain) and we were all suckered.


99 posted on 01/19/2008 7:37:04 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Maybe you didn't read this:

"Put up a liberal RINO against a liberal rodent and take a wild guess who wins."

We'll see if the party confirms the liberal hijacking at the convention. If they do, the party can go screw itself.

100 posted on 01/19/2008 7:38:40 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson