Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite a disappointing finish, Thompson doesn't bow out
Chicago Tribune ^ | Jan. 19, 2008 | William Douglas

Posted on 01/19/2008 6:31:23 PM PST by FocusNexus

Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson didn't drop out of the Republican presidential field after his disappointing finish in Saturday's South Carolina primary -- but he sounded close to it.

About an hour after the polls closed, Thompson addressed a ballroom in a college student union, an event that featured as many students enjoying free beer as it did hardcore Thompson supporters. He delivered a lengthy soliloquy, speaking in the past tense about "clear conservatism," the cornerstone of his campaign.

"My friends, we will always be bound by a close bond because we have traveled a very special road together for a very special purpose," Thompson told the crowd. "It's never even been about me, it's never been about you. It's been about our country."

Thompson's campaign declined to say whether the speech was a concession, a swan song, a stump speech to signal that he's fighting on, or what. Campaign spokesmen wouldn't say what the former Tennessee senator's next move is.

"The campaign is still a campaign until it's not the campaign," said Rich Galen, a Thompson campaign senior adviser. "There's no hurry to make a decision, other than your deadline. I don't have anything to add -- not tonight."

Thompson conceded earlier Saturday that he needed a win in South Carolina to keep his presidential campaign alive.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; gopprimary; sc2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last
To: FocusNexus

“What happened to Thompson? One word: Huckabee,” said Clemson University political science professor Dave Woodard. “He stole all his (Thompson’s) votes. As Huckabee began to rise, he got more money, more mailings, and the values voters who were going to Fred switched allegiances to Huckabee.”

That would seem to not make any sense. Didn’t Fred enter the race AFTER Huckabee?


141 posted on 01/19/2008 8:09:12 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“McPain and GWB are on the same page re: amnesty. So what? If you have proamnesty vs proamnesty in the general election, you have to look to other factors to make a choice. For me, nat’l defense makes the choice of GOP v DEM very clear, and very easy.”

Just one serious terrorist act carried out by people who crossed our southern border and Jorge and McPain might finally be able to make the logical linkage between national security and non-enforcement of our borders and immigration laws. Or, American citizens would make the link and find Jorge and McPain to be two of those most responsible for ongoing non-enforcement.

I can’t take one word seriously anyone says about national security if they aren’t for strict border and internal enforcement of immigration laws.

Jorge Bush and Juan McPain are two of the least serious office holders when it comes to national security.

The World Trade Center was not located in Baghdad or Kabul.


142 posted on 01/19/2008 8:09:33 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Huck
A third party is almost impossible. But, think about this...Not getting much play at present is the fact that if Obama and Hillary continue to split the vote, there may be two fractured political parties. That could open the door...it’s possible.
143 posted on 01/19/2008 8:10:24 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

McPain is one of many of our traitors on the Mexican border conflict, and this evening a Border Patrol agent was shot and killed while in pursuit of someone in a Humvee illegally crossing into California. They turned and sped back to Mexico. Thanks, McPain, and sorry to say, Bush, there is going to be war down there yet.


144 posted on 01/19/2008 8:11:22 PM PST by luvadavi (Duncan Hunter in 08--a choice not a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
YES, and I am tired of the Republicans and RINOs keeping the DemocRATS from jamming socialism down our throats!
145 posted on 01/19/2008 8:11:23 PM PST by BillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“No Huck staying in takes votes from Thompson a real conservative”

You honestly think Huckabee and Thompson are pulling from the same pool of voters? The two are opposites. Huckabee believes the government should force a segment of the population’s values on the entire population. Fred believes the government shouldn’t be involved. Their messages don’t even begin to overlap.


146 posted on 01/19/2008 8:11:26 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
YES, and I am tired of the Republicans and RINOs keeping the DemocRATS from jamming socialism down our throats!
147 posted on 01/19/2008 8:11:27 PM PST by BillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Huck
So, you folks ready to face facts about Fred yet?

The question is whether or not the GOP is willing to accept the facts. We are in quite the pickle without a consensus candidate. None of the others fits the bill. So if Fred is gone and there is a ceiling on the support of each of the others, where will it leave the party?

Maybe one of them eeks out the required delegates, but where will the base be during the run? Only the portion of the base that belongs to whatever faction wins will be sending money and working toward the general. It's quite possible a large majority will sit out the vote, too. Especially since our nominee, whichever left leaning one we pick, will almost certainly run back to the left in the general because all of them have been there in the past, are most comfortable there, and they believe they will need to do that to win.

In a race with leftists, we can't win with one of the left tilting baggage queens we have to choose from. In addition, we have the probability that Ron Paul will run 3rd party. We will no doubt lose many of those from the base who are still inclined to participate to a protest vote. [Sorry, but an angry, betrayed base will do things like that. Remember Ross Perot?]

So, ultimately, the party will be faced with the elephant in The Elephant's living room. The reason Fred was drafted was because, among the remaining field, no one passes as a convincing conservative and the weight of the baggage they all carry puts off large segments of the voting population for each one of them. One even has mental problems no one wants to openly discuss.

So what is the GOP to do? Without Fred or another conservative uniter in the race, we are heading off the cliff no matter whom we choose. The only possible hope may be to pray we can't pick and hope that somewhere, in a smoky back room at the convention, some acceptable solution is found. But if the consensus is that we should pick from among the candidates who ran in the race, it would have to be Fred Thompson or Duncan Hunter.

So, round and round we go...and there we are.

148 posted on 01/19/2008 8:11:56 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: luvadavi

They are indeed quite comfortable with that situation for some sick reason ....


149 posted on 01/19/2008 8:13:12 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (No RINO's -VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
Susan Estrich is talking ...

*arrrggghhh* (hands over ears) .. Nananananananana....

Otherwise, good uplifting post, thanks!

150 posted on 01/19/2008 8:14:13 PM PST by Finny (FOX News: "We report only what we like. You decide based on what we decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Huck
If he stays in he helps McCain by taking votes from Huck and Romney. What surprise.

Most of the people who espouse this particular conspiracy theory believe that Thompson and McCain basically marched in lock-step in the senate, and believe most of the same things.

But if that were true, then they would be competing for the same voters, correct? Logically Thompson would be splitting the McCain vote (or McCain would be splitting the Thompson vote), and without Thompson in the race McCain would have even more support.

151 posted on 01/19/2008 8:14:20 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"Jimmuh Carter."

*ding* We have a winnuh. That's what you get when you put up a liberal RINO for President.

152 posted on 01/19/2008 8:15:08 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

“Romney is has nothing but money and so far it’s bought him very little.”

Oh yeah, he only has 3 firsts, 2 seconds, and more delegates than anyone else. But I guess that’s nothing.


153 posted on 01/19/2008 8:15:34 PM PST by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist
No third party. We have to clean our own house.

This party isn't my house -- it's a co-op. And the lifestyles of my co-habitors seem increasingly incompatible with my own.

154 posted on 01/19/2008 8:16:20 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

I heard how afraid the media was of Hunter even today before he withdrew from the race.

I’m sorry, but I’m not buying it. Fred drew his line in the sand in South Carolina and the result was not even close.

He obviously didn’t mean what he said, because he’s going to continue on to Florida without any money or any boldness where he can say he’s drawing the line there. Nobody is afraid of him.

Feel free to retrieve this statement of mine if he proves me wrong in ten days. I don’t like a big plate of crow, but I’ve eaten it before. I’m willing to bet I’ll be eating something else.


155 posted on 01/19/2008 8:16:44 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
What do we gain voting for a liberal RINO nominee ? Nothing. Let the rodent party take the full credit for the $hitstorm mess they’re going to create with their horrific leftist policies....

Amen, FM Jock!

156 posted on 01/19/2008 8:16:49 PM PST by Finny (FOX News: "We report only what we like. You decide based on what we decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Huck
With McCain, you get a senile nut who has been moving to the left with each successive year he's been in the Senate. He'd probably make Lieberman his running mate.

With Romney, you just simply get screwed. Pathological liar and liberal. Ditto Huckster.

Conservatives have nothing to vote for. Nothing.

157 posted on 01/19/2008 8:17:58 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I think prolly he held his nose....but I think now that hes had a quiet chance to reflect on it...He'd be man enough to admit a mistake..

Your philosophy appears to be that of the Frog in the kettle....The water is warm and feels nice.......for now...

158 posted on 01/19/2008 8:18:35 PM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ellery

“Most of the people who espouse this particular conspiracy theory believe that Thompson and McCain basically marched in lock-step in the senate, and believe most of the same things.”

That does seem to be the centerpoint of the argument, along with Thompson’s endorsement of McCain in 2000.

“But if that were true, then they would be competing for the same voters, correct?”

You must remember that Thompson didn’t choose to run, people begged him to. A look back at posts on this very forum at the beginning of last year will reveal the real reason. He was recruited because he was conservative enough, and because he was famous, and his supporters were hoping for an Arnold-esque cruise into the White House.


159 posted on 01/19/2008 8:18:55 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

Truth is always the enemy of the liberal, no matter which party they infest.


160 posted on 01/19/2008 8:19:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson