To: NavVet
Rush was actually ambivalent on the ports deal.No he wasn't. He was for it and spoke about it quite often until it was scrapped
80 posted on
01/19/2008 10:28:25 AM PST by
Syncro
To: Syncro
He was generally for it, as not posing an increased security threat, but said it was a political loser on day one and didn’t stump for it. He did not strongly advocate for it.
86 posted on
01/19/2008 10:31:01 AM PST by
NavVet
( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it defend in the General Election)
To: Syncro
Yes he was and yes he did!
I remember it quite explicitly because he ran counter to everything Mark was saying about it. The two of them being on opposite sides really confused me for awhile.
139 posted on
01/19/2008 11:01:52 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson