Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I do remember Rush getting his panties in a twist about that one.
1 posted on 01/19/2008 9:41:42 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: pissant

Sometimes the listening and reading comprehension of some people who should know better is mindboggling. *sigh*


32 posted on 01/19/2008 10:01:14 AM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Funny thing is.. I think he's even less well known now, nationally, than when he started "running"...

Here's a sugestion.. Why not get a hobby, like woodworking or bird watching? Then he won't have to sit around answering phones or whatever it is that he does all day.

37 posted on 01/19/2008 10:03:56 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Rush was actually ambivalent on the ports deal. I think Hunter’s protectionist tendencies is probably what keeps him from getting Rush’s support.
39 posted on 01/19/2008 10:05:40 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it defend in the General Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Rush is an unabashed globalist and Hunter is a nationalist. The two are ideologically incompatible.


44 posted on 01/19/2008 10:07:06 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Take heart, my boy, Ronaldus Magnus wasn't the Republican standard-bearer in '76, either. The extra bit of maturity did him and us all good. He got his eight years in eventually, capped by the Soviet Union implosion. That might not have been possible from '77-'84.

In upcoming elections will we see Duncan in "food fights" with El-Rushbo based on this perceived slight, or will Hunter truly let himself become all he can be, as did RWR?

HF

45 posted on 01/19/2008 10:07:22 AM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I like Duncan Hunter. I think Rush is concentrating on who can actually win. Again, Duncan Hunter is a stellar conservative.


49 posted on 01/19/2008 10:09:53 AM PST by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Rush has never indicated any problem with Duncan Hunter. Duncan has just not gotten high enough for him to comment on. Dubai has nothing to do with it, Duncan is actually closer to Rush than any other candidate. Rush wasn't that concerned with the Dubai issue, what he was concerned about was the blind demagoguery going on when it came to light. The Dems got to show what great patriots they were by getting all pumped up over the issue, and then Republicans joined in.

I was against the Dubai deal, too, but the hypocrisy by Dems was noticeable. They would sell us out in a heartbeat, as shown in China in the 90s, the Soviet Union in the 80s, and in Iran right now.

52 posted on 01/19/2008 10:11:27 AM PST by Defiant (Don't be a hostage to Hope.....Arkansas. Vote Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Drinking Coffee"I was surprised to hear Rush Limbaugh the other day say that there was no 'Thoroughbred' Conservative in the 2008 Republican nomination Field for President."

Maybe he meant there was no thoroughbred conservative in the race.  With 'in the race' being the pivotal point instead of 'thoroughbred.'  No doubt Hunter is the most thoroughbred conservative person in America, not just in the nomination field.
54 posted on 01/19/2008 10:13:46 AM PST by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Rush has always made a point that it is not his job to prop up a candidate. At the beginning of the race, Huckabee (who I have no use for) and Duncan Hunter (who I will pull the lever for, because he is the most conservative candidate) started at 1%. Huckabee is at double digits and Hunter is still at 1%. Blame it on Rush?
58 posted on 01/19/2008 10:15:58 AM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I care less about Rush’s opinion all the time.
He has done a great job for the conservative cause over the years, but he has a large ego.


63 posted on 01/19/2008 10:17:55 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; counterpunch; Onerom99; All

Wow! The whole Hate-Hunter gang is here and piling on in this thread. Their dislike of a real Conservative is becoming borderline pathologic.


65 posted on 01/19/2008 10:19:32 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Why would Rush back someone who isn't going to win the general election?

Hunter is a great conservative voice, but he is too conservative to win a general election.

That's unfortunate for America, but it's the truth

75 posted on 01/19/2008 10:26:23 AM PST by Popman (Gold Standard: Trying to squeeze a 50 lb economy back into a 5 lb bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Convinces me, even more, that Hunter is the man we need to see as president of the US.


77 posted on 01/19/2008 10:26:37 AM PST by sneakers (This Pennsylvania gal supports DUNCAN HUNTER for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
The GOP has a long history of choosing ex-Governors as their nominee.

And, they have a proven track record in that regard.

I don't think it's anything personal with Rush.

91 posted on 01/19/2008 10:32:37 AM PST by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Its the same reason why Rush doesn’t back Thompson. He doesn’t want to support someone who will not win. Rush talks about Conservativism works everytime its tried, but he never backs any candidates that do try it.


101 posted on 01/19/2008 10:37:54 AM PST by Bommer ("He that controls the spice controls the universe!" (unfortunately that spice is Nutmeg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
I support DH, but I ultimately looked at how Schmuckie Schumer came down on the Dubai Ports Deal to see what really happened (See tagline). The truth is that Schmuckie was probably getting money under the table from the US bidder to operate the ports and that’s why he was so outraged. DH’s objections were undoubtedly much more noble. I’m sure DH was concerned that Dubai would know about military material movements and loss of US jobs, which are valid concerns. OTOH, Rush and W saw the value in rewarding a relatively strong ally in the region. Tough call, but the Schmuck-factor turned me to Rush and W’s side on this one.
107 posted on 01/19/2008 10:42:05 AM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Rush, as well many Republicans including right here at FR, my husband and others were totally for the Dubai issue. It is not just Rush. This piece (article) is written to blast Rush as much as Hunter.

OK, I was and still am 100% against the Dubai issue in any way. Just something interesting, take a look at a thread that is here at FR about Dubai to Build $600M Hub in US "Corridor of Shame". It always shocks me when I see articles like that and see so many that are FOR it. This is right here at FR and not only Rush and others being for Dubai.

I disagree with them but it still does not make Rush a jerk or those on here jerks that seem to think Dubai will be good for America. I think it is just theyh look at Dubai and our security different then I do. I am extreme about not wanting any dealings with the likes of Dubai, I do NOT trust them at all.

The way I read this article, it also believe it or not, promotes Hunter as an awesome man, strong in what he believes in and will go to the end of time with his beliefs of what is right and wrong. I LOVE THAT! Especially because I agree with Hunter completely!

He truly is the ONLY man that is 100% conservative, a man that will take a stand for our country from the enemies within ( the dems and rino's) and do what is best for America.

The only other man that would be good is Fred Thompson.But this thread is about Hunter.

Here is what I have observed, and it is very concerning to me:

The Republican party has left it's conservative base almost in the dust. This election will be either a time to keep it alive or kill it off. That will be up to how many conservatives wise up, wake up and stop pushing rino's like Rudy, McCain, Huckabee etc. Conservatives seem to have fallen for the BS of the media of who can beat Hillary or Obama instead of staying strong and going all out to support a conservative. It can be seen here at FR, and other places online and in person as well. IMO a true conservative could never support a rino like the ones I mentioned. And if they have over the years doing the lesser of two evils thing then one would hope by now they would be sick or it and see that it is just voting for a Democrat lite.

Now this will not be taken kindly by Hunter's campaign people but his campaign stinks. He has got to have the worst working for him. They have not promoted him well at all. One of my friends has a blog, and it has been almost impossible to post things about him with no videos (recent) and even audio's of his latest speaking engagemnents he has had.

When he first started and even now there is no blog roll for him, like you see with the others. Hell even Fred Thompson's blog rolls are not updated so there too more slacking off for a conservative candidate. And yes emails were sent asking about this and guess what no replies. sheesh!!!!!!

Everyone at a friend of mine's blog is FOR Hunter FIRST and then for Thompson second. Because of the lack of whatever happening for Hunter we are all pulling for Thompson.

You have to understand to give money to a candidate that has a campagin manager or whoever it is that is NOT promoting him to even help all of us propmote him as well, it is only going to make sure that a rino wins instead of the ONLY other conservative running, Thompson.

This is the reality, not some article like the one for this thread that could easily apply to the many even here at FR that are FOR Dubai ports and the "Dubai to Build $600M Hub in US "Corridor of Shame".

I cannot tell you how disappointed I am at what has happened to Hunter because he truly is my first choice. It not only disappoints me but scares the hell out of me for my beloved America. I made my mind up never to vote for a rino again after voting for rino Bush! So for me it is Thompson and maybe if God smiles down on us he will pick Hunter for a VP. And I would love John Bolton for Sec. of Defense.

116 posted on 01/19/2008 10:46:14 AM PST by Brandie (Vote for a Conservative! NO to Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Duncan Hunter is very strong on national defense and border security. These are the two most pressing issues we face. On social issues he is rock solid today, and rock solid in all days past. What’s not to like?

He lacks support because he lacks exposure because he lacks support because he lacks exposure, etc. He has not broken out of that cycle. Because of his conservatism, the press keeps the lights off the man. Breaking out of the cycle is mostly his job. His supporters can help. Kind words from those who give endorsements can help. Ann Coulter has had positive words. Rush should also. But I'm not surprised that Rush mentions Fred and Mitt most often as they appear to be the most viable, most conservative candidates right now. Maybe a brokered convention is Duncan's best hope.

My only possible concern would be on trade. But who’s to say that China is not a concern and that trade with China should not be an issue? Also his emphasis on keeping industrial skills that are vital to national defense on shore is a valid national security issue - not an invalid trade issue.

118 posted on 01/19/2008 10:47:46 AM PST by ChessExpert (This enemy is more dangerous than any threat we faced in the 20th century, LTG Sanchez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Rush Limbaugh seems to believe that the bigger the business the more highly exhalted the individuals are, who run it -- and that they should not have to bother with pesky matters like American interests.

This is revealing. The reason these money-first people have taken over the GOP from the top down, is to "conserve" their money.

That's why the can't tolerate either Hunter or Huckabee.

126 posted on 01/19/2008 10:50:56 AM PST by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Duncan Hunter is a great guy, and he truly is authentic. It’s a mystery why some people don’t get out of the bottom tier or the lower tiers in campaigns. But, remember, this is his first chance, it’s his first time going up in a national audience, and he’s got a future ahead of him if he wants to try to continue to do this. Whatever happens here does not rule him out forever. ~~~ Rush Limbaugh

I don't have control over any of these guys. I'm not on their campaign staff. I'm not their campaign managers. Endorsing during primaries, I don't care if it's federal, state, or local, is something that I have stayed away from as a political and professional practice, and I have not abandoned it at this point, and I'm not going to. But in light of this, because I haven't endorsed, there are those of you out there who want me to endorse your candidate because you think if I were to come out in favor of your candidate that it would provide a boost, and so what happens is -- actually throughout the whole fall and the early winter -- people were calling here, "Why don't you endorse somebody?" Why don't you endorse this candidate or that candidate, happened to be their own, and I gave my reasons for not doing so. ~~~ Rush Limbaugh

143 posted on 01/19/2008 11:05:28 AM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson