Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BA pilot feared the worst as he struggled to land plane
Times (UK) ^ | 1/19/07 | Steven Swinford and Richard Woods

Posted on 01/19/2008 8:39:33 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: TalonDJ

How fast would the systems have rebooted? Remember, the co-pilot first noticed a problem 40 seconds before planned landing. And we don’t actually know that the systems didn’t start rebooting, either just before or just after the landing.

Like I said, I don’t really think this was an EMP, but I do think al Qaeda, with its vast money and expertise, is capable of producing an EMP weapon that could do this sort of thing, though perhaps with unreliable results — i.e. a reliability level that wouldn’t be acceptable for military or law enforcement use, but would be acceptable if your only purpose is to wreak havoc in the Western world. Something highly unreliable would surely be easier to build, and thus some into existence sooner, than something reliable.


81 posted on 01/21/2008 6:39:20 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
This COPILOT had bawrs. BIG ONES! He dropped the nose of the aircraft , got up some speed, and then brought the nose up so she would drift in. If he had pulled up for a go around, they all would be dead. WOW!

I'm tired of hearing that airline pilots are just glorified bus drivers. This is what they should be paid a good living for.

82 posted on 01/21/2008 6:46:17 PM PST by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

No, the investigators said on Saturday that they were focusing on avionics and electrical systems. Remember, the very first concern in a crash landing situation is fire. Determining whether there was any significant amount of fuel in the tanks or spilled in the crash path would have been accomplished within a half hour of the crash, probably sooner. It’s possible that something caused the flow of fuel to the engines to be stopped, but at this point I think the “ran out of fuel” possibility has been ruled out.

At this point, they’ve already moved the plane off the tarmac — something they most definitely would not have done without establishing whether there was fuel in the tanks. And if the tanks had been breached by the impact and lost their fuel while skidding along, every passenger and emergency ground crew worker would have smelled it — there was a very short distance between the impact and where the plane came to a complete stop.


83 posted on 01/21/2008 6:47:13 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

I don’t know the hot start reboot requirements on that particular system but it would be a matter of a handful of seconds. Yes we don’t know if it happened but I would have expected it to mention somewhere if all the displays blanked. They described thir dawning knowlege that something was wrong in terms of ‘the autothrottle moved the levers and now extra thrust happened’ instead of in terms of ‘everything went out for a few seconds and when it came back we were losing power’.


84 posted on 01/22/2008 7:54:29 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson