American voters are also getting more of their information from the Internet, where such information is disseminated. They see these people flocking to Paul, and then they can easily review Paul's record and his speeches. They can compare and contrast Paul's record and statements with the kooks, and make their own decisions.
They see that candidate’s signs along with the anti-war, anti-Bush and anti-American signs in protests.
None of these people have been in attendance at Paul's campaign rallies or in rallies conducted by Meetup groups. I'm telling you. The hardcore, anti-war left and 9/11 Truthers are NOT supporting Paul. They are supporting Kucinich, Gravel, and to an extent Obama, because their style of anti-war is completely different from what Paul is advocating. Paul does not believe that our troops should be humanitarian relief workers in Africa or freeing Tibet; the anti-war left does. They support war and interventionism, but only if its for liberal pet causes like promoting "peace" and envirowackoism.
Paul’s views have attracted the offensive fringe.
And please define "offensive." Ordinary Americans who never gave a crap about politics before are now out there supporting Paul fervently, and they're dismissed as "kooks?" For years, the media and conservatives here complained about the sheeple staying home, but now Paul comes on the scene and awakens them, they should be dismissed as "fringe" then? What type of illogical bullfeces is this?
“The hardcore, anti-war left and 9/11 Truthers are NOT supporting Paul.”
Oh really? Then I suppose Alex Jones has not endorsed Ron Paul as reported? I suppose Ron Paul has not been on the Alex Jones Show multiple times. I suppose Alex Jones is not the 911 Truther conspiracy theorist that he appears to be on his website. And I suppose this quote is not on the Alex Jones website “Jones is considered by many to be the grandfather of what has come to be known as the 9/11 Truth Movement.”