Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom
There is nothing realistic about Hunter as VP.

VP selection is a POTUS in running decision based upon his/her mindset as to who would serve their administration best in that position.

Fred Thompson IMO would never chose Mitt Romney as second in command.

It would be a personal decision not a financial decision.

51 posted on 01/19/2008 9:36:59 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: EGPWS

Not if it’s done for political and strategic reasons.

If it’s a choice between winning with Romney or losing, I would hope he would take Romney.

You really think Reagan CHOSE GWH Bush?


53 posted on 01/19/2008 9:48:14 AM PST by Politicalmom (I'm the aunt of a brand-new Naval Officer. I'm proud of you, Kristi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: EGPWS
Hunter is a statistical blip with an asterisk beside it.
56 posted on 01/19/2008 9:55:16 AM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson