To: Politicalmom
There is nothing realistic about Hunter as VP.VP selection is a POTUS in running decision based upon his/her mindset as to who would serve their administration best in that position.
Fred Thompson IMO would never chose Mitt Romney as second in command.
It would be a personal decision not a financial decision.
51 posted on
01/19/2008 9:36:59 AM PST by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: EGPWS
Not if it’s done for political and strategic reasons.
If it’s a choice between winning with Romney or losing, I would hope he would take Romney.
You really think Reagan CHOSE GWH Bush?
53 posted on
01/19/2008 9:48:14 AM PST by
Politicalmom
(I'm the aunt of a brand-new Naval Officer. I'm proud of you, Kristi.)
To: EGPWS
Hunter is a statistical blip with an asterisk beside it.
56 posted on
01/19/2008 9:55:16 AM PST by
streetpreacher
(Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson