Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Identity Politics Is Chauvinism Under Another Name (Hitchens Hits It Out of the Park - MUST READ!)
Captain's Quarters ^ | Jan. 19, 2008 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 01/19/2008 7:25:41 AM PST by jdm

Reportedly, Christopher Hitchens has just given up smoking. Apparently, this has had no effect on his curmudgeonly tone, but then again, Hitchens could hardly get more pointed in his criticisms. Today he rightly sets his sights on identity politics and exposes it as a trade for one bigotry over another:

People who think with their epidermis or their genitalia or their clan are the problem to begin with. One does not banish this specter by invoking it. If I would not vote against someone on the grounds of "race" or "gender" alone, then by the exact same token I would not cast a vote in his or her favor for the identical reason. Yet see how this obvious question makes fairly intelligent people say the most alarmingly stupid things.

Madeleine Albright has said that there is "a special place in hell for women who don't help each other." What are the implications of this statement? Would it be an argument in favor of the candidacy of Mrs. Clinton? Would this mean that Elizabeth Edwards and Michelle Obama don't deserve the help of fellow females? If the Republicans nominated a woman would Ms. Albright instantly switch parties out of sheer sisterhood? Of course not. (And this wearisome tripe from someone who was once our secretary of state . . .) ...

I shall not vote for Sen. Obama and it will not be because he -- like me and like all of us -- carries African genes. And I shall not be voting for Mrs. Clinton, who has the gall to inform me after a career of overweening entitlement that there is "a double standard" at work for women in politics; and I assure you now that this decision of mine has only to do with the content of her character. We will know that we have put this behind us when -- as with the vowel -- we have outgrown and forgotten the original prejudice.

At the heart of Hitchens' argument is this fact: it is just as chauvinistic to vote for someone on the basis of their gender or ethnicity as it is to vote against them for the same reason. It's reflexively a form of bigotry, the notion that a candidate is superior for these superficial reasons, or that different groups should get "turns" at holding power. The latter especially represents the antithesis of individual liberty and equality and instead vaults identity politics into a system in which elites make determinations of power distribution.

In that system, the real power remains with the elites, not with the symbolic representation of the groups -- and the elites know it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chauvinism; christopherhitchens; gender; identitypolitics
"People who think with their epidermis or their genitalia or their clan are the problem to begin with. One does not banish this specter by invoking it. If I would not vote against someone on the grounds of "race" or "gender" alone, then by the exact same token I would not cast a vote in his or her favor for the identical reason. Yet see how this obvious question makes fairly intelligent people say the most alarmingly stupid things."

- Christopher Hitchens

1 posted on 01/19/2008 7:25:44 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm
"Madeleine Albright has said that there is "a special place in hell for women who don't help each other."

Mrs. Edwards and Mrs. Obama best get to helping Mrs. Clinton, otherwise there is a special place in hell for them.

2 posted on 01/19/2008 7:31:39 AM PST by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Hitchens appears to be implying exactly what I believe: politics is the art of the possible, and, to the extent that we have some power of choice in the matter, our choice is best expressed as a dual function of principle and expediency.
1. What is feasible?
2. What are my ideological underpinnings?
3. What sort of governance can I tolerate?
There must be a least common denominator in there somewhere. Of course, it is hoped that the individual voter obtains all the best of it; but that is SELDOM the case.


3 posted on 01/19/2008 7:43:00 AM PST by Migraine (...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
"Madeleine Albright has said that there is "a special place in hell for women who don't help each other."

Ms Albright would presumably know this to be true, since, by the look of her, she already resides there.

4 posted on 01/19/2008 7:47:36 AM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Madeleine Albright is, and will always be, a useless lump.


5 posted on 01/19/2008 7:47:48 AM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Hillary's "identity politics" (the term is associated with her) has always consisted of this proposition:

Let's all gang up on the straight white Christian guys and take away their ball and their bat so they can't play any more.

We'll play "Mother May I" instead. And I get to be Mother and make the rules.

Not much to it, when you get down to it.

6 posted on 01/19/2008 7:51:19 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Octar
Madeleine Albright is, and will always be, a useless lump.

Oh, I dunno....Slick always seemed to find a use for her.

As a doorstop, if nothing else.

7 posted on 01/19/2008 7:52:41 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdm

HAS BEEN....HAS BEEN....HAS BEEN....HAS BEEN...HAS BEEN...

Leftover clintin nobody. She did nothing in office. She’s a joke and a loser too.


8 posted on 01/19/2008 9:02:27 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever fully realize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Bump.


9 posted on 01/19/2008 9:06:51 AM PST by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

Madalein Albright is a female?

wow you do learn something new every day...

(since when is a feminist a female?)


10 posted on 01/19/2008 4:22:32 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson